Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of informal groups
What is the impact of an informal group on a formal organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of informal groups
Informal groups are a group of employees who associate or work together without the influence or direction of management. Few employees usually compose informal groups. These few employees usually share physical proximity and interplay ideas, feeling or opinions about the workplace. Formal organization can be created or rescinded by management, but informal organization cannot be revoked because management did not inaugurate the organization. At the very epicenter of the informal group are people and their relationships with one another. Built upon the organizational structure and the delegation of authority formal groups contrast in difference the informal groups.
Small informal groups are the very building blocks of informal organization. Unless, an organization consists of a few individuals, informal originations exist. Informal originations may differ from formal originations, but they are functioning entities in an institution. When informal groups began to establish a set of norms and standards, they begin to create an informal organization. The informal group also invokes conformity and implements sanctions to ensure conformity to the norms of the group.
The informal leader, member of the primary group, members who have only fringe status, and members who have out status compose the four status positions of the informal group. The group leader is whom the primary members of the group closely associate with. The group that closely associates with the leader is considered the nucleus of the group. Newcomers to the group are usually new employees to the organization. Newcomers remain on the fringe on the group while their being evaluated. The newcomers are either accepted into the primary or fringe groups or moved into the...
... middle of paper ...
...taliation.
When the best interest of an institution is the interest of the informal leaders, they can be great assistance to management because of their ability to control the informal organizations. The informal leaders can take a tremendous burden from the manager and formal leaders in an organization when the interest of the organization and the interest of the informal leader coincide. To encourage a positive relationship with informal leaders, the supervisor can pass information on to that particular person before given it to anyone else.
A place of business will always have informal organization based on informal groups. The purpose of the informal organization is to satisfy the needs and desires of the group’s members. The supervisor should have a healthy working relationship with leaders of the informal group to ensure an effective working environment.
Ralph Nader, Mark Green and Joel Seligman, in an excerpt from Taming the Giant Corporation (1976, found in Honest Work by Ciulla, Martin and Solomon), take the current role of the company board of directors and suggest changes that should be made to make the board to be efficient. They claim the current makeup of the board does not necessarily do justice to the company because “in nearly every large American business…there exists a management autocracy” (Nader, Green and Seligman, 1976, p.570). The main resolution they present is to make the board more democratic with the betterment of the company as its first priority. Currently the board no longer oversees operations, or elects top company executives and they are no longer involved in the business operations to the extent they should be. Nadar, Green and Seligman argue that that all of these things need to be changed. For a corporation so large to be successful there must be separation of powers just as there is in any current government system ( p.571). They claim this is the only and best way to success (Nader, Green and Seligman, 1976, p.570-571).
Group interaction: is a procedure by which verbal and nonverbal messages are traded between a constrained numbers, normally from 3 to 20 individuals. This typically happens in a meeting, for example, school, healing centre, care home and school inside of the staffs. In the course of the group communication, each individual will attempt and get their thoughts and considerations crosswise over to the general population in the
In our world today every country has their own set of avowed and ascribed identities for it's population. An avowed identity is one a person gives to themselves, a woman might say she’s a sister or a wife. The opposite of that is an ascribed identity, or how society sees someone. For example, a rich person could be perceived as a snob. To ascribe someone with an identity is to judge them based on societal norms. The entertainment industry in America is no different then it's parent culture. Both men and women in this industry have identities placed on them, and they change based on their career. Women are given more negative ascriptions than men in the media. That is how Americans identify people they read about, with the identities the media gives them. Women are more negatively perceived that men in the music and fashion industry because of their ascribed identities in the media, and gender roles in our nation.
According to social psychologists a group is composed of more than two individuals who depend and interact with each other in some manner (Lessing). Examples of groups include a class, a football team, a cult etc. Groups normally have various similar features including: norms that determine the right behavior, roles assigned to individuals, which determine what responsibilities and behaviors people should undertake, a communication structure and a power structure, which determines how much influence and authority group members have. For example, a class has norms, like the time people should arrive in class. The role of the professor includes teaching, administering exams and inviting discussions. The ro...
The organizations that dominate our society are known as formal organizations. Businesses, schools (colleges and universities, corporations, governments, churches and other religious institutions all fall under the category of a formal organization. Basically any institution you come into contact with on a daily basis. The harsh reality is that every person in this world, your friends, family, professors, bosses, especially you are a member of an organization; possibly several. And each of us contributes to the organization in our own way whether we want to or don’t.
Leaders will often separate in-group and out-group members based on similarities of the group member and the leader. Other characteristics that can play into it are age, gender, or even a member’s personality. A member can be granted in-group status if the leader thinks the member is competent and is going above and beyond to perform the job functions. As mentioned the two groups that members can fall into are in-group and out-group. In-group members are those that share similarities with the leader. Those similarities can be personality, work ethic, common interests, or even alma maters. In-group members often go above and beyond their job description and the leader does more for these members. In-group members will have their opinions and work ideas looked at in higher regard than out-group members. In-group members typically have higher job satisfaction within the group and are less likely to experience turnover. In-group members are often promoted within the organization f...
This week’s report deals with the concept of in and out-groups. As we begin, we will be looking into what exactly makes an in and out-group. We will also study the concepts of in and out-groups. Once we wrap up the first portion of the research we will immediately be going into our second section. The second portion will consist of describing a personal example in which I was part of an in-group situation. Once I divulge my personal example, I will be describing a situation in which a colleague of mine found himself in an out-group situation. Once we study these two situations, the report will navigate into the third portion in which we will be analyzing and explaining some of the differences between my in-group situation and my colleague’s out-group experience. As we move into the fourth section of the report, we will be looking into how in-groups and out-groups affect organizations and their employees. The fifth section of the report will explain how the out-group situation in which my colleague found himself was directly caused by an extend of a non-task related factors. Finally, as we reach the final section of the report, the report will describe some of the implications that can occur when leader’s develop a relationship with their followers.
Even though we are all categorized in to groups from the day were conceived. We can still create our own group, and whether are not you create your own group or if it was chosen for you there will be effective and ineffective aspects of that group. Base the circumstances that each individual’s values and beliefs are different. Further more, participation and similarity of other group members and the goals of the group will also affect the group dynamic.
The bond between members, in contrast to the dyad, is not as strong even though the social group or organization may be formed for the purpose of advancing the group or organization as a whole. The importance of each individual member’s identity and participation within the larger groups diminishes significantly with increased membership, in addition to a more divided system of labor and scattered informal communication. During the course of a year in a large organization, meetings may take place during which members may communicate and discuss various aspects of running the organization. However, these meetings are usually set up and run with some sort of order, and each individual member may not have an opportunity to present his or her opinions, confront an idea he or she opposes, or voice support for an item of discussion. In college, I was a member of a sorority with about 90 members at full capacity or quota; not everyone could hold an executive or official position, and there was simply not time during our scheduled meetings to allow each member to speak. Sorority members would form coalitions (often in the form of dyads and triads) within the organization by interacting outside of formal meetings; these coalitions could strengthen the bond between members and unite them toward common goals, or it could divide members and cause conflict within the organization. An advantage to larger groups, however, is the ability to divide tasks needed to support the social group among an increased number of members. “As the size of a group increases beyond three people, members tend to specialize in different tasks, and everyday communication patterns change” (Kendall 145). When tasks are divided and distributed among more members, less stress is placed on individual members responsible for the well-being of the social group and this can
Informal leaders: due to charisma and general popularity, certain members of the organization win more influence than originally intended.
By conducting the Hawthorne studies, various assumptions were discovered. A person's work behaviour is not easily determined as a cause and effect relationship; however it is determined by a complex set of attributes. Informal groups that were present in the organisation form a social structure which was preserved through job related symbols of prestige and power. Change in the organisation can be avoided by being more aware of the employees' sentiments and their participation. The findings of the experiments led to the discovery that the workplace is a close knit social system and not just a production system.
roles of informal communities for social interaction on one hand and the formal provisions for
Leadership, without doubt, is a significantly important function of management. It helps to aggrandize efficiency and to fulfil an organization’s goals. Leadership is the ability of a manager to induce the subordinates to work with confidence, determination, courage and zeal. It is also defined as ability to influence a group towards the realization of a goal. Leaders should have the capability of developing future visions, and to drive the organizational members to want to attain the visions. This paper states my points in which I duly believe, justifies the importance of an outstanding leader in any organization.