1 Kings 17: 8-24

1492 Words3 Pages

1. Introduction This exegesis paper will analyze the pericope 1 Kings 17:8-24. It is going to share its background information, draft a commentary based on exegetical analysis, deduce its theological messages and put forward appropriation for contemporary world. 2. Authorship, Date, Occasion and Purpose The book of Kings is referred to as a single book and its composition is credited to the prophet Jeremiah. The identification of the sources and their utilization in the composition lead directly to the question of the book’s author. It is adopted that the book of Kings is developed in two stages: the first major edition appeared during the reign of Josiah and was redacted and extended in a second edition during the Exile. The date of composition …show more content…

Sickness (1 Kings 17:17a) b. The mistress’s complaint (1 Kings 17:17b-19a) c. The prophet’s action (1 Kings 17:19b-21) d. The marvelous restoration (1 Kings 17:23) e. Interpretive conclusion: her testimony (1 Kings 17:24) Most critics agree that 1 Kings 17:2-16 are to be distinguished from 1 Kingds 17:17-24 because of the latter’s different subject matter and theme. אַחַר הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה “After these things” (1 Kings 17:17) is an often-employed device for attaching extraneous material. 5. Specific Historical Context The Battle with the Baal cult is a major constituent within the Deuteronomistic History. The alliance of Ahab with Phoenicia, with his marriage to Jezebel, daughter of Ethbaal, king of Sidon (16:31), made both Israel and Phoenicia dependent on the powers of Baal. It is suggested that there is an editor or circles who were sympathetic to Jehu’s eradicate Phoenician (Baalistic) elements from Israelite society. In order to fully appreciate Elijah’s conflict with the prophets of Baal (1 Kings 17-18), one must read the story against the cultural background of Baalism, which was at this time a state religion in the northern kingdom (1 Kings 16:31-32). 6. Exegetical Analysis of the

Open Document