Social Rights Dbq

779 Words2 Pages

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a push for equality for minorities was in the forefront of America. The obstacles restricting equality amongst all were race, class, and gender prejudices. An example of this can be seen in the Voter's Right act of 1965, which banned racial discrimination in voting. Prior to this act, minorities faced many obstacles including taxes, literacy test, harassment and physical violence. The battle to receive the rights that whites had was a long struggle both physically and mentally, reasons being: first, the laws had to be changed and second, combating the opposition of those who valiantly resisted these changes .The result has been every expansion of civil and political rights in American history. Resistance …show more content…

One of the most key examples of this is the Social Security Act of 1935, that established an adequate provision for the welfare of old aged persons through a system of federal old age benefits that most of us take for granted. Old-age pensions to citizens were based on a person’s history of paid employment. Those who worked most steady over the longest period of time (holding a job) and earned the most were granted the highest pensions; to no surprise, these tended to be white men. On the flip side, employers who employed the majority of women of color (agricultural and domestic labor) had no coverage. The unpaid domestic and reproductive labor of wives also had no coverage, entitling women who did not work outside of their home to a very little pension. The Social Security Act also discriminated against millions of African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Mexican-Americans and new immigrants from Europe who went from job to job, whom all fell at the bottom of the hierarchical scale . The seldom did not maintain the same job long enough to receive coverage by Social Security. When the law was passed, the NAACP protested commenting that the law had made a, “sieve with holes just big enough for most negroes in the U.S. to fall through.” A statement also true for a lot of …show more content…

In all eras that have seen progression toward the extension rights to a group that have been previously without these rights, there have been resistance among those who already enjoy those rights arguing that, the extension to a new group would in some peculiar way, wear away the value of those rights. This same argument was heard recently in the political battle over whether same-sex partners should be allowed to marry. If same-sex partners were allowed to marry, it would devalue heterosexual marriages. This seems to be a recurring phenomenon in

Open Document