Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of communication skills
Strengths and weaknesses of communication skills
The importance of communication skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of communication skills
Have you ever wondered what the line is between crazy or sane? Is there a way, a definitive test, that can tell for sure whether or not a person is crazy? If you take the time to study psychology and specifically the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, you are sure to find out that you can easily be diagnosed with some level and type of mental disorder. This line of questioning is what begins, in my opinion, one of the best TED talks I have viewed. In his speech, Answers to the Psychopath Test, writer and filmmaker Jon Ronson takes the listener on an amazing journey that explores the strange and maddening world of psychopathy.
Right from the beginning there are several ideas from the Communication: Principle for a Lifetime, textbook that overwhelm the listener, and add to the successful delivery of the speech. The first idea, even before Ronson begins speaking, is the use of attention-getting support material. The stage is a dimly lit bright red circle with Ronson standing in the middle. Behind him are two support assistants providing lighting, visual, and sound presentations. In big ominous letters on the wall behind Ronson are the initials DSM alluding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual which he refers to in his opening.
Ronson's speech starts with a personal story intended to connect the listener, and shed some light on what got him thinking about the idea in the first place. In analyzing this first part of the speech, as described by authors Steven A. Beebe, Susan J. Beebe, and Diana K. Ivy in Communication: Principles for a Lifetime, Ronson's presentation type falls into the category of a presentation about ideas (Beebe 364). As he speaks he connects the listener to a short chronological history of the DSM, and explai...
... middle of paper ...
...sual and audio symbolism sets the mood for the points Ronson is speaking.
In the end, Ronson sums up his speech by asking the question, “What would you do?” In this question it somewhat compels a discussion between listeners, and yet, at the same time is rhetorical from the speaker, because he has already answered what he would do. By using this technique he has planted a seed of discussion. The discussion however, was to be between others, and not him, because he has already set his position. Overall it was an intriguing and deeply provoking way to end a speech.
Works Cited
Beebe, Steven A., Susan J. Beebe, and Diana K. Ivy. Communication: Principles for a Lifetime. Boston: Pearson, 2013. Print.
Ronson, Jon. "Jon Ronson: Strange Answers to the Psychopath Test." TED 2012. 28 May 2014. .
Hare, R. D. (1999). Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of Psychopaths Among Us. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
...res of the psychopaths and gives the reader various examples of these individuals playing out these characteristics in everyday life. A widely used checklist is provided so the reader can get a wide spanning view of what is accounted for when scoring a psychopath. This form of research is very important within the deceitfulness of this population; it allows the professional to ignore their words and examine their actions. Hare made it clear that it is not uncommon for there to be an emotional and verbal disconnect from their actions. With virtually no emotional functioning psychopaths feel no remorse for the offenses that they commit and it is very important that we work towards using the opportunities we have to study and assist these populations; not only for them but for ourselves.
Despite the incomprehensibility of their actions, serial killers make for fascinating case studies in abnormal psychology. There is something profoundly inhuman about an individual who displays a total disregard for another person’s life or safety. In addition, there is an underlying curiosity about how they develop, what influences their thought patterns, and why they are motivated to commit certain unspeakable acts. Ted Bundy, for example, is a perfect specimen of a serial killer with psychopathy. Not only is Bundy renowned for the number of murders he committed over roughly four years, but many continue to express disbelief at how nonchalant and unremorseful he was. Thus, Ted Bundy is an interesting case study because of his social history,
Hybels, Saundra, and Richard L. Weaver. Communicating effectively. 4. ed. New York [u.a.: McGraw-Hill, 1995. Print.
When Ronson wraps up his work in The Psychopath Test, a novel, he creates a theme of paranoia as he ventured into an industry of madness. He establishes his work’s meaning that any individual may appear normal, abnormal, or be a psychopath within. In other words, his theme follows the idea that life can be full of deceiving people. In order to convey his theme, he used four significant characters. They include himself as the narrator, David Shayler with Rachel North, and Robert Hare. These characters not only emphasize Ronson’s theme, but also help establish the purpose of his theme, which is to showcase that madness can be anywhere.
Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. In W. Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of communication (pp. 3-26). Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
New studies reveal that psychopaths not only understand right from wrong, but can justify their morally inappropriate actions regardless of the consequences. Psychology experts Maaike Cima, Marc Hauser and Franca Tonnaer devised a hypothesis that could potentially render previous preconceptions about psychopathy moot:
Smith, Voncile. "Listening." In A Handbook of Communication Skills, edited by Owen Hargie, 256-265. London: Croom Helm, 1986.
Eunson, B 1994, Writing and presenting reports, The Communication Skills Series, John Wiley & Sons, Milton, Queensland.
The prime objective of communication is to relay information from one individual or group to another. A message is a necessity of communication and it should be expressed through a channel to the receiver. Understanding the message is highly important as it helps in conveying an appropriate reaction. In this case, the receiver is expected to respond to the sender within a given timeframe. Additionally, communication is not a monologue but a dialogue. Thus, it suffices to say that communication is regarded as a two-way approach that is not completed without the sender providing a response from the receiver concerning how well he or she has grasped the message.
Communication is one of the most important factors in our lives. It dictates the relationships formed with the individuals in personal and professional lives. Effective communication provides a foundation for trust and respect to grow. It also helps better understand a person and the context of the conversation. Individuals often believe that their communication skills are much better than what they actually are. Communication appears effortless; however, much of what two people discuss gets misunderstood, thus leading to conflicts and distress. To communicate effectively, one must understand the emotion behind the information being said. Knowing how to communicate effectively can improve relationships one has at home, work and in social affairs. Understanding communication skills such as; listening, non-verbal communication and managing stress can help better the relationships one has with others.
I realized that my speech should flow back and forth between the discussions of effective vs. ineffective communication. This strategy will better illustrate to my audience how to successfully get their ideas across.
Communication plays an integral role in all facets of business. How one communicates with others is not only a reflection of the individual, but on the organization as a whole. If effective communication is lacking, it can have an adverse effect on day to day business operations as well as employee morale and job satisfaction. If an organization is to be successful, effective internal and external communication should be a primary focus. In this paper, I will address the need for effective communication throughout all levels of the organization and the challenges that may arise if effective communication skills are not utilized.
Communication is a process of sending and receiving information among people. Humans communicate with others not only by face-to-face communication, but also by giving information by the internet and printed products such as books and newspapers. Many people believe that the significance of communication is like the importance of breathing (Hasan, 2015). Although this may be considered as true, communication facilitates the spread of knowledge and forms relationships between people. Communication is a very important aspect in all walks of life. Communication helps to understand one another in the world in which we live and it is key to success in relationships, in the workplace, as a citizen of this country, and across a lifetime. The ability to communicate comes from experience.
The subject of this story is a murderer repeatedly trying to prove not his innocence, but his sanity. The speaker begins his confession by addressing the audience, “You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing” (Poe). The rest of the work is an argumentative confession, each image of an attempt to describe “how wisely [he] proceeded,” relying on the generally accepted stereotype of a madman in the 1800s— a raving lunatic completely lacking logical thought and purposeful action; but the reader knows that rationale is not this speaker’s issue; it is not a problem of the mind but of the soul or heart. The idea of ‘moral insanity’ was first introduced by Benjamin Rush in the late 1700s and changed the foundations of psychology and the implications of an insanity plea in court. In an article critiquing Poe’s work, Bynum explains that “where Rush broke with traditional psychiatric theory was in declaring that insanity did not necessarily involve a disorder of the intellect, that the moral faculties alone were capable of succumbing to disease.” Although modern culture and psychologists now identify this condition as ‘antisocial personality disorder,’ (the defining characteristic of both psychopaths and sociopaths), it was extremely controversial for medical professionals at the time. How does one diagnose or