Processes of Tourism Planning in Government Sustainability Policies and Planning

688 Words2 Pages

Given that the purpose of this paper is to identify and explore the processes of tourism planning in government sustainability policies and planning and their subsequent effectiveness, a qualitative approach was employed. The study used the non-probability sampling design to collect data from tourism local authorities and agencies. As Kelley, Clark, Brown, & Sitzia (2003) rightly observed the purposive sampling technique was found to be adequate and appropriate for such a survey research. In view of the facts given above, the purposive sampling method was adopted. Interview guides and questionnaires were the instruments used for data collection. The interviews and questionnaire administration was made to local authorities government tourism agencies (MTENR/ZAWA/ZEMA), local Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM), and consultants. In addition institutions related to the Zambian tourism industry were also contacted for requisite information and data. To be able to capture a significant number of tourism planners in the population sample, data was collected from tourism agencies at the Lusaka Ministry of Tourism Environment Natural and Resources, Zambia Wildlife Authority in Lusaka’s Chilanga headquarters, Zambia Tourism Board Lusaka and Regional Local ZAWA branch in Livingstone (Mosi-oa-Tunya) area.Local Livingstone greater area communities leaders of Community Resources Boards (CBR) agencies and popular lodges, tourism enterprises and guesthouses in Livingstone form the local community. The research was conducted from the month of November 2012 until, April, 2013. A total of 85 questionnaires were filled in for this particular study, 9 in-depth face to face interviews were carried out with persons involved in the po...

... middle of paper ...

...o assist in categorisation of respondents. However, recognising the small sample specific population involved in this survey, a range of open questions were included to generate a source of more qualitative, explanatory information that can add a richer dimension to understanding responses. Hence, the fieldwork aimed to interview representatives of the major groups. It was designed using a series of semi-structured interviews with key actors. Bartlett et al (2001) explained the criterion used to determine sample size is an important issue in research. The study uses descriptive data analysis and explanation, and the use of appropriate theory to help explain events (Attia 1999, Helmy 1999). However, the study does not aim to answer a policy question or solve a pressing social problem, but rather explain the causes and consequences of planning and policy decisions.

Open Document