Workplace Discrimination Case Paper

If I was the judge in this case I would have to say that I would be in favor of the plaintiff. When looking at the case, the employers should be concerned when it comes to avoiding discrimination in every employment decisions. In this case the plaintiff is an attorney that is a female and Gallina is an associate in the law firm. The situation in this case is when her employer found out that she was having a baby. This issue was raised only after the news got back to the employer and not when she began working for the company. As soon as her employer found out about her having a baby, they began to treat her differently in a bad way. This included harsh tones and language. The law states that when one has filed a complaint, the employer should exercise care in the decision related to the employee who has filed the charges or even filed a case against discrimination.

In addition, employers should exercise care and even caution when it comes to their language that is used when dealing with their junior employees. This is when she received a performance review that was negative. The plaintiff felt that there was discrimination against women that have kids and this lead her to raise concern with others in the the firm. This lead to her including other people such as

This reminder would include providing regular sessions for the managerial employees when it comes to three topics. My first topic would be on harassment, and discrimination, and lastly retaliation. I do believe that Gallina was a victim of all three issues listed. Next, I would include that the firm needs to include provisions that are annual when it comes to the policies and procedures. There should be refresher courses on conduct that can be seen as a federal law violation. This in turn will aid in preventing claims. As a judge, I would create a provision in law which tries to avoid damages that includes a three step action