Why We Should Not Be Replaced Textbooks In Schools

1547 Words4 Pages

As the 21st century progresses, the world is rapidly developing into a place where there is a heavy reliance on technology, growing even more dependent as new advances are made. This is an era for the expansion of resources and for what seems to be the betterment of mankind. Think back to about 100 years ago. Think about the way that humans used to live, without any technical gadgets to rely upon to carry out the basic functions of society. For instance, many years ago the only way a class full of students would be taught a good education was through the use of a textbook. Flash forward to this century, where one can now potentially walk into a school and find the descendants of the original students using tools such as iPads, tablets, or computers. This style of teaching is becoming more and more popular as the school systems aspire to keep …show more content…

What is so special about using these fancy gadgets that makes them more beneficial or different than using hand-held textbooks? Discussions have begun to develop, and the controversy over this topic continues to increase. Although there are many benefits to using online books in schools, textbooks should not be replaced by tablets or any other electronic devices in the classroom. It is true that the majority of textbooks are not up to date with modern information and can therefore be seen as unreliable sources. In fact, one of the major arguments that educators use to support their defense of electronic devices in the classroom is that online books have the ability to be edited and updated within a matter of days. By contrast, it takes years for textbooks to be changed due to the complex and time consuming process of editing, printing, shipping, and delivery. According to electronic advocates Chairman Julius

Open Document