Why is it that we as human beings feel the need to blame someone for every negative situation, which occurs? If we really look at the situation with any great depth, we may discover that an almost endless amount of things may be 'blamed' for the tragedy blaming an individual is pointless - only fate can really be blamed. Some characters who are more commonly blamed are Romeo and Juliet themselves. With their headstrong personalities, and love, which seemed so sure, they had in fact condemned themselves. Romeo was the first to promote the relationship at the Capulet party. It was a case of 'love-at-first-sight' for him, so he felt obligated to seek Juliet at her balcony, and charm the engagement into existence. However the reality was that the relationship was condemned before it had even began due to the parent's hatred for one another. Romeo knew the two families didn't get on, so he also should have also known that the relationship was ill fated. Yet he still persisted in promoting the relationship. Surely he could have controlled his urges and stayed in the bushes in front of Juliet's balcony on the night of the Capulet party. On the other hand love is often considered an impulsive thing, and Romeo being an impulsive person only made the matter worse. An example of Romeo's impulsive behavior was when he chased Tybalt after Tybalt killed Mercutio, which resulted in Tibet's death. Romeo was horrified with what he had done, and expressed that he felt very irresponsible by crying out; "O, I am fortunes fool!" Some may say that Romeo's reactions were only out of love, but does that really make him any less to blame? I am sure that when the photographers chased Princess Diana in her car, that the... ... middle of paper ... ... easier had Juliet married Paris as her parents wished her to. Instead she was very headstrong about the situation. "I will not marry yet. And when I do I swear it shall be to Romeo for whom you know I hate rather than Paris..." Juliet certainly should have known that the results would be disastrous had she married a hated Montague. Some may say that Juliet marrying Paris would have been a tragedy in itself, but surely it would have been far less severe than the loss of two lives! In conclusion, it is not bang said that the inventor of iron is not responsible, nor the ancestor of the Capulet, they were simply examples of how silly and useless blaming an individual is. Indeed in situations like these, either no one or anyone is to blame. Every little thing contributes - hence; the only thing, which can be blamed, is fate.
The most blameable is fate. Fate is kind of like predestination. Everything for your life is already planned out. Evidence of this is in the play’s prologue. It states “ A pair of star cross’d lovers take their life; ” (DBQ project. Whos to Blame?, Document A). What it is trying to say is that ROmeo and Juliet’s relationship is doomed to fail. The term “star cross’d” means frustrated or aggravated by the stars. Those who believe in astrology claim the stars control human destiny. Another reason would be Romeo’s punishment for killing Tybalt. The evidence behind this fact is in Document C, Friar Lawrence says “ I already know
While reading Shakespeare's play “Romeo and Juliet” it is easy to see that everybody in the story is at fault for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Personally however, I believe that three of the main characters are more at fault then the other characters. First is Mercutio, Romeo’s best friend. Next is Benvolio, nephew of Lord Montague and Romeo’s other friend. Last is Friar Lawrence, Romeo and Juliet Franciscan Priest. In a story of unorthodox love, family feuding, and violence, many are at blame for the deaths.
The nation is about to be in another Middle East war, but they don’t know it yet, even the president doesn’t know it. Will Paul Hood inform the president with the correct information in time? Will war break out in Azerbaijan? In this political thriller you really don’t know what is going on right up until the end.
The deaths of Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet was brought upon the young love by the emotions the family surrounding them were dealing with, as children we grow up defining the word blame as a feel or declare that it is something or someone responsible for fault or wrong doings, but in this story of love and lust who really was to blame for the death of Romeo and Juliet? was it themselves or the people surrounding them?
Taking Responsibility for the Deaths of Romeo and Juliet in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
Romeo and Juliet is widely known to be a tragedy, but what caused the atrocity for which it is so renowned? Some may argue fate was to blame for Romeo’s and Juliet’s deaths, that the situations these young lovers faced were depicted as being out of their control. Could Romeo have refused to attend the Capulet masque? Was Romeo destined to duel the raging Tybalt? Did Romeo and Juliet truly have to kill themselves? If one considers the specific circumstances and causes of these situations, the fact that all scenarios are the result of choice rather than chance, and the notion that the characters were never left without options, only one conclusion can be determined. It was unarguably the decisions made by characters, not those made by fate, that were responsible for the tragedy in Romeo and Juliet.
We do not know much about Tom’s childhood; however it is clear that his life has progressed into a sociopathic lifestyle. We do know that, “[His] parents died when [he] was very small” and that “[He] was raised by [his] aunt in Boston.” (25) He disliked his aunt, hated her, and wanted to kill her.
Not long ago, a boy strutted into a schoolhouse with the smuggest face you would ever get the chance to see. He did just that very strut right up to Mr. Dobbins, the schoolmaster, and announced that he had been hanging out with Huckleberry Finn, therefore skipping school. That boy was Tom Sawyer, and that boy will be remembered as exactly what he was: an imaginative, good-hearted boy with a degree of mischief that led to his untimely demise.
No one person is to blame for the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet but Romeo was a major person that contributed to his death. To begin with Romeo states, ”Shall bitterly begin his fearful date, With this night's revels and expire the term, Of a despised life closed in my breast, By some vile forfeit of untimely death”(Act 1 Scene 4). Romeo says this while he is on his way to the Capulet’s party. He knows that he will find something that night that will lead to his death. Benvolio also tells romeo, “Romeo, away, be gone!, The citizens are up, and Tybalt slain, Stand not amazed: the prince will doom thee death, If thou art taken: hence, be gone, away!”(Act 3 Scene 1). When Romeo kills Tybalt he should’ve have thought through his actions, because Tybalt being Juliet’s cousin this would bring more hate between the two families. This
Many people are familiar with the story of William Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet,” a tale of two star-crossed lovers married in secret despite the hatred between their families. After seeing, or believing to see, the other deceased, the two choose to take their own lives rather than be without their true love. However, many people don't consider whose actions caused the downfall of the relationship, leading to the death of the two young lovers. Romeo engendered the relationship’s lack of success by three careless actions: eavesdropping on Juliet, murdering Juliet’s cousin Tybalt, and drinking poison.
Firstly, Romeo and Juliet’s problematic marriage was a result of their impulsiveness. In Verona, the Capulet-Montague feud was infamous: even the servants loathed each other. Therefore, Romeo and Juliet knew of the consequences their marriage would entail since their families dislike each other. Yet, they still took that risk and got married. Afterwards, their secret marriage caused a big problem for Juliet. Lord Capulet was unaware of
Tom Sawyer, a mischievous, brave, and daring boy that goes through adventures in love, murder, and treasure. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain is about a boy maturing from a whimsical troublemaker into a caring young man. In the "conclusion" Mark Twain writes, "It being strictly a history of a boy, it must stop here; the story could not go much farther without becoming a history of a man" Tom is now maturing throughout a span of adventures in love, treasure, and everyday life that make him more of an adult, then a boy.
Juliet’s father didn’t try to force her into marriage maybe things would have turned out different,
The average person doesn’t meet someone, profess their love for them, and ask her hand in marriage all in one night… but Romeo does. In Shakespeare’s calamity of Romeo and Juliet, Romeo is the idiot that does all of this. I blame Romeo for the death of these star-crossed lovers, along with the other four characters. If it wasn’t for his impetuous nature, none of this would have happened. Romeo’s relationship with Juliet could be more thought out and more planned. Although the play ended with his death included, without him Juliet and others would have kept their lives.
His antics were ingenious though. The way that he turned whitewashing the fence as a punishment into a grand experience for all of the boys in town who couldn’t wait to hold the brush and paint. Tom was not a bad boy, just an inquisitive one who’s mind never rested… always dreaming, and making his dreams sound so good, he could always rope Huck Finn into his escapades. Tom couldn’t lie, and he couldn’t see someone suffer for the sins of another, as seen when he tells the truth about the murder of Dr. Robinson. It took real guts to point the finger at "Injun Joe", the half-breed, who was also one of the most despicable scoundrels in the town. Tom was also loyal to his friends, and showed that when he wouldn’t tell that Huck Finn was with him that night the doctor was killed in the graveyard. Tom also couldn’t leave Becky Thatcher in the cave when they were lost and she had all but given up hope of being found.