More handpicked essays just for you.
History of the beatles essay
The Beatles and their influence on culture
The appearance of the Beatles influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Who is better: The Beatles or The Rolling Stones? This is quite possibly the most debated question in the history of rock music. Unfortunately, many debaters don’t learn the facts about these two legendary bands before plunging into heated arguments about this topic. What is surprising about these two groups is that they are exceptionally alike. Though they are minuscule, there are distinctions that set The Beatles and The Rolling Stones apart. The Beatles are known, respectively, as the fathers of modern pop music. After their first #1 hit “Please Please Me” was released in 1963 the Beatles were set in motion to become one of the most influential groups of musicians to ever rock our world. With over forty-nine records, 37 #1’s, and thirty- four number one albums (the highest amount of any band in history), there is no denying that they made a monumental ripple in the musical world. John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr surprisingly all come from humble beginnings in a town that, until their superstardom, was barely noticed on the map. Liverpool, being kn...
I’m here today to discuss, compare, and contrast the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, two of the best rock and roll bands from the 1960s. During the British Invasion, both of these bands had a lasting impression worldwide inspiring many of the current artists today. Although both bands are similar, they have many differences.
The Beatles are an iconic English rock band and are widely regarded as the “foremost and most influential act of the rock era” (Unterberg). Formed in Liverpool in 1960, the Beatles were comprised of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, with Stuart Sutcliffe on bass guitar in January and Pete
The Beatles and the Beach Boys are two of the most recognized, well-known and most popular musical acts of the 1960’s right through to the 1970’s. I will be focusing on the group acts rather than solo performers such as John Lennon, Paul McCartney and George Harrison of the Beatles, who took their own stylistic approach to their music after the Beatles’ separation. Each group’s arrangement and use of instruments classify them as part of the overall associated sound and typical subject matter of songs in the 1960’s, yet remain different enough to distinguish between each group’s desired sound.
British rock ‘n’ roll began in the 1950’s and it wasn’t until the 1960’s when The Beatles heightened the start of the British Invasion. The band consisted of eclectic individuals such as John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr. The Beatles’ group dynamic was founded on team-based operations as well as two-way innovations such as problem-to-solution and solution-to-problem of team building. However, like every group, internal and external interaction arose creating competition, which lead to both positive and negative conflict.
The Beatles was not only artist with good songs. They were more than artist who truly influenced lives that had them. Since, I learned about their fame first hand, I thought their music was quite over-rated. However, while I researched for my reaction paper, I found out that it was truly the Beatles who deserve such praise after all these years. Therefore, I would like to write a reaction paper on the Beatles and how they truly deserve the fame.
Next was the most important of music’s time- Beatlemania in the ‘60s. A group of boys from Liverpool had an attendance of 15 people at their first concert, and continued to lead the world into a whole new era of music. Accompanying the Beatles for the 1960s were The Beach Boys. They carried a light harmonic sound that was perfect for the beach.
...ts of the music industry to consider, bands are bound to get confused. Most of the Beatles arguments were between the original four Beatles, rather than between band members being removed or added as they were in Pink Floyd. Ironically, the demolition of the groups resulted from the Beatles losing bandmates John Lennon and George Harrison, and Pink Floyd’s constant controversy. To choose between The Beatles and Pink Floyd would be more than a generation’s influence of opinion, it would largely rely on the preference of underground and psychedelic or pop and psychedelic music, not to mention the groups approach with the public. With a combination of these factors, one would be inclined to choose Pink Floyd, after a generation that overplayed “Let it Be,” a general preference of underground, and a reputation Pink Floyd refused to be affected by regardless of society.
...eatest/)! The Beatles’ success can be attributed to a combination of factors, including John Lennon and Paul McCartney’s songwriting genius, George Harrison’s guitar playing prowess, Ringo Starr’s artful simplicity as a drummer, and the solid group harmonies that were a distinctive feature of their recordings (http://rockhall.com/inductees/the-beatles/bio/).
Rolling Stones became popular rather quickly when they changed their sound of music from blues to rock and roll. They would eventually experiment with almost all types of rock music, but still never drifted too far from the blues. The Rolling Stones was like the Beatles alter ego. While The Beatles avoided singing about controversy and class distinctions, The Rolling Stones revealed them. They were seen as the “bad boys” in rock, singing about subjects considered taboo, like sex, drugs, and violence. At times, they would write songs to be honest and draw attention to subjects that were commonly avoided.
Before The Beatles became one of the most important rock groups of all time, they had encountered many challenges on their rise to fame. John Lennon(vocals, keyboard, guitar, harmonica) met Paul McCartney (vocals, bass guitar, keyboard, and guitar) when they were performing in a small group
(Charlton) Only the Beatles and Elvis have elicited the same level of sexual hysteria as Mick Jagger. Wholesome the Beatles may have seemed, there is no danger of that being cast at the Stones. Jagger's bluesy vocals and spastic, often sexually suggestive stage moves got the band pegged as troublemakers which was quite the opposite of the more clean-cut, Beatles. Much has been written about Mick Jagger's stage moves and the spell those moves have cast over audiences. A writer Philip Norman summed it up best in 1984 when he compared Jagger to Elvis, "Presley, while he made girls scream, did not have Jagger's ability to make men feel uncomfortable." (Morrissey) In fact, Jagger's performance style was so unique and striking scholars used it in gender and sexuality studies. (Howell) Jagger's singing voice, often described by music critics as unexceptional, paved the way for more unique voices to be heard. The acceptance of Jagger's voice on pop radio was a turning point in rock & roll. He broke open the door for everyone else. They were Rock and Roll's bad boys for more than a decade.
Success was hard for the Beatles started as the Quarrymen then turning into the Silver Beatles and touring through Germany playing long hours’ day and night at different clubs and venues. In fact, and article written by Andrew Romano from the Daily Beast states that one of Gladwell’s theory is revolved around Hamburg during their intense hours of playing. He states that after the Beatles had reached their point of fame during 1964, they had performed a total of twelve hundred times which Gladwell states” the idea that excellence at performing a complex task requires a minimal level of practice”. According to Gladwell this is what allowed them to become they greatest rock band of all time. Although this was Beatles point of greatness, once returning to Liverpool they still had a point to prove the world. After Brian Epstein spent many days convincing different labels, being rejected by the same record labels, changing their style, and cleaning up their act for the music industry, they were finally able to sign a label with United Kingdom’s leading music record company during May of 1962. By October of 1963, the Beatles had the opportunity to appear on the Sunday Night At the Long Palladium. During this time, if one was able to perform here you had reached a high point in the
The Rolling Stones are one of the most well known hard rock bands. They have a distinctive history that separates them from other similar rock bands. Their unique sound formed the basis of rock and roll. The band had a huge influence on British music through things such as their fashion, fusion of obscure genres, and attitude. Over the course of the last fifty years, The Rolling Stones unique history, sound, and overall look still has an influence on modern British bands.
share the immediate success of the Beatles. But its staying power has been testified to by several generations.
In their initial incarnation as cheerful, wisecracking moptops, the Fab Four revolutionized the sound, style, and attitude of popular music and opened rock and roll’s doors to a tidal wave of British rock acts. Their initial impact would have been enough to establish the Beatles as one of their era’s most influential cultural forces, but they didn’t stop there. Although their initial style was a highly original, irresistibly catchy synthesis of early American rock and roll and R&B, the Beatles spent the rest of the 1960s expanding rock’s stylistic frontiers, consistently staking out new musical territory on each release...