Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dostoyevsky essays
Dostoyevsky essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dostoyevsky essays
In the Note from the Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky, in part on of his fictional narrative the narrator introduced himself as a man who is spiteful and who diagnosis himself as sick. He mentions how his acts are product of his spitefulness and that he finds himself unattractive. The narrator is not very trust worthy because he contradicts himself and his beliefs, he belief his very sick but does not believe in doctors, even though he has much respect for medicine and doctors. In this narrative of part one it really hard to trust the narrator because of the many contradictions he makes about him being spiteful man. He expresses that even though he believes his a spiteful official because he was rude and took pleasure on being …show more content…
He also makes a reference to Nikolai Chernyshevsky's “What Is to Be Done?” by mentioning the “Palace of Crystal” from the fourth dream in the novel, he kind of make fun of it by saying what good of having a crystal palace if their no suffrage and by comparing it to a hen’s house. This narrator just makes me not trust him because he changes his mind to much, he is a spiteful person. He believes that suffrage is the origin of the conscious, but that the conscious is a man greatest misfortune even though he believes without it there is no happiness. It is funny how he wants us to enjoy that he is making fun of What is to be Done by comparing the crystal place to a hens’ house and saying he would not take a hens’ house for a mansion. Dostoevsky is very sneaky because even though he does not mention the tittle of What to be Done, he does uses it in sentence to make clear to that he is making fun at a specific work of writing. Note from the Underground it a very interesting fictional narrative, the narrator tries to confuse us regarding if he is a spiteful person, at first he admits to being spiteful, but throughout the reading he kind of denies it. Just by how the narrator makes fun of people show he can’t
shall find [the Devil] out if he has come among us, and I mean to
in the book, that he is a good natured old gossip. He is a useful
The first section is a prologue by the scop that introduces the speaker’s words of uncertainty about his present life. He “longs” (1) for mercy and is “troubled” (2) about exile. Unhappily, he acknowledges the
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Notes from Underground: A New Translation, Backgrounds and Sources, Responses, Criticism. Norton Critical Edition. New York: Norton, 1989.
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Notes from Underground and the Grand Inquisitor, trans. R. E. Matlaw. New York: Dutton, 1960.
Have no delight in passing away the time unless to spy my shadow in the sun and descant on mine own deformity. And therefore since I cannot prove a lover to entertain these fair, well-spoken days. I am determined to prove a villain and hate the idle pleasures of these days.” He says that since he was not made to be a lover, he has. no use for peace, and will willingly destroy peace with his crimes.
...us on deadly revenge. In each case, a retribution that is carried out in a cruel and callous fashion. The men fulfilling these actions are cold, calculating, and contemplative. They have painstakingly endeavored to seek retribution against what has plagued them: Fortunato and his insults to the Montresor and the old man’s piercing, chilling eye for the man from “The Tell-Tale Heart”. Driven to the point of madness by their own obsessions, they plot to murder their offenders. The tales are told each by the man who has indeed committed the crime. Each man’s insanity becomes more and more clear as they narrate confession; the Montresor with the unfailing ease with which he dictates his account and the man from “The Tell-Tale Heart” with his jagged and rough delivery. Their distinct mental instability calls into question to reliability of the report they give.
All through the novel I didn 't comprehend why he was harming himself, physically and inwardly. Well I did, but only to an extent. Eitherway I felt like he was doing those things intentionally to himself because at any moment he could have come out and come clean, he could have changed everything in a moment as opposed to continuing suffering. In any case, now I perceive how helpless he really was, and how he has totally lost himself. As I see it now, I believe that all he has done to compensate for his sin, made me pity him all the more, for there is no chance to get him to live a rational/ sane life
...ds) and a bit mad, he says repetitively how beautiful the ‘monster’ is going to be but as soon as he is alive he becomes some hideous creature to him that should never have been born and therefore he must shun him. The way he narrates the story it is that he is angelic and justified for his actions and the monster (his creation) is benevolent and a disgrace!
secondly, "the spirit of perverseness" as described by the narrator is basically an acute explaination of whats was going on in his head.
Now, one might argue that because the narrator thinks this story “is worth a book in itself. Sympathetically set forth it would tap many strange, beautiful qualities in obscure men”, then he is biased: ergo, he’s an unreliable narrator (1940). However, being biased in and of itself is not the sole criterion for a narrator be...
Crime and Punishment and Notes from the Underground Fyodor Dostoyevsky's stories are stories of a sort of rebirth. He weaves a tale of severe human suffering and how each character attempts to escape from this misery. In the novel Crime and Punishment, he tells the story of Raskolnikov, a former student who murders an old pawnbroker as an attempt to prove a theory. In Notes from the Underground, we are given a chance to explore Dostoyevsky's opinion of human beings.
inner conflict as well. He realizes how horrible and atrocious his sins are but is unable to feel remorse. While he seems to be an intelligent and virtuous man, he cannot seem to control his violent fits of drunken rage. He also deals with conflict on a more spiritual level. The cat that he has killed is haunting him. He tries to shrug it off as coincidence, but every time he comes up with an explanation for an unsettling even...
Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoyevsky is a truly remarkable novel. Dostoyevsky's novels probe the cause of human action. They questioned conventional wisdom of what drove humans and offered insight into the inner workings and torments of the human soul.
The next character introduced is the narrator. He is both complex and interesting. He thinks he is not crazy. As he goes out of his way to prove that his is not insane, he does the exact opposite. His relationship with the old man is unknown. However, he does say he loves the old man. “I loved the old man.” (Poe 1).