Analysis Of Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky

2263 Words5 Pages

A hero is both the strongest and weakest point of a story. When our heroic character encounters challenges, obstacles or though decisions, the reader can be called upon to act as a cosmic arbitrator for our main hero character and gain the understanding to grow and learn from these lessons. Sometimes these imaginary human beings have compelling stories to tell. The stories they tell are usually of great feats and marvelous adventures. There is little doubt that most of us have experienced such heroes. However Jesus' Son deviously throws us in a spirally, crazy, hazy and a seemingly unconnected world of a drug addict simply referred to us Fuckhead. Unfortunately for Fuckhead, who is also the narrator in the book, the world that Dennis Johnson, …show more content…

Dostoyevsky, a Russian novelist and writer, gave a great contribution to the exploration of human nature as well as development of deep and profound psychological character profiles. Usually this means that Dostoyevsky puts great emphasis on what an individual experiences and relationships between an individual and the society. In his master piece Crime and Punishment the author goes beyond just asking primordial questions like what is right and what is good. Dostoyevsky pleads us to go inside the mind and try to understand the reasoning process behind the crime of the main character Rodion …show more content…

But unlike the previous two he commits a crime for which he does not care about. Mersault is emotionally "blind" in social and personal interactions. He does not care about love and even when sentenced guilty for his crime of murder, he remains unconcerned and indifferent. This absurd situation in which Mersault has found himself and his inability to fit into social norms and rules have earned him the title of a senseless and ruthless murderer. Camus wanted to reduce the heroes meaning to a bare minimum. This makes Mersault's character as someone you do not like nor would like to ever meet. Either way, the reader is forced to judge him because Mersault feels

Open Document