When No One Read, Who Started To Write Summary

882 Words2 Pages

Archeologists, historians, and other scholars have long been debating on the topic of who created the writing system and why it was invented. It is nearly impossible in this community to get a unanimous decision on what the correct answer is when opposing opinions are always present. John Noble Wilford of The New York Times explains how experts are trying to get an accurate (and agreed upon) “understanding of how and why the invention responsible for the great divide in human culture between prehistory and history had come about.”1 His title, When No One Read, Who Started to Write?, is summing up one of the most debated topics by intellectuals all over the world. This article shows us how important writing is to the development, interaction, …show more content…

Historians are constantly debating on whether writing was “invented once and spread elsewhere or arose independently several times”2. A general chronological order has been developed; Sumerians were first beginning in the third millennium B.C., followed by Egypt, the Indus Valley, China, and lastly Mesoamerica (including the Olmecs, Mayans, and Zapotecs). Archeologists have discovered indications that cultures like the Chinese or Indus Valley have independently created writing systems. But, contradicting statements have been made on this theory and other valid evidence has been found to disprove the accusation. This constant state of flux among experts proves that we do not have an agreed upon answer for this question. We do not know for sure whether writing was invented and spread, or if it was invented all over the world …show more content…

While one side favors “origins in the visual arts, pictograms of things being transformed into increasingly abstract symbols for things, names, and eventually words in speech”3, the other believes that “writing grew out of the pieces of clay in assorted sizes and shapes that Sumerian accountants had used as tokens to keep track of livestock and stores of grain.”4 Cuneiform was initially used for recording economic information such as documents about property, inventory, and even taxes according to Dr. Damerow. He agrees with the idea that “writing appeared to have developed in two stages, first as a new but limited means of recording economic information, later as a broader encoding of spoken language for stories, arguments, descriptions or messages from one ruler to another.”5 One thing that is almost agreed upon by everyone is the realization that writing was not initially a direct delivery of speech. Early records of writing show that the language used in writing was restricted and did not speak in sentences and narratives like spoken language does. Although this agreement may seem beneficial to finally reaching a definite answer to this topic, “ancient writing is a field hot with controversy, and few scholarly conclusions go unchallenged.”6 Disagreements are bound to occur with every new discovery related to early

Open Document