What Makes A War Hero Summary

793 Words2 Pages

A Hero, Warrior, or Act of Bravery In “What Makes a War Hero,” Karl Marlantes points out the meaning of bravery, a hero, and a warrior. Marlantes explains how acts of bravery are committed by numerous people, but they do not define them as a hero. A hero is someone who goes beyond what is expected and risks their own life for the benefit of others. On the other hand, a warrior may never have to perform an act of bravery but is willing to risk their lives and inflict violence on others. [Thesis]: This article accurately explains the difference between acts of bravery, heroes, and warriors. As the article states, not all acts of bravery are considered acts of heroism because they are carried out for selfish reasons. For example, a commander can perform an act of bravery and even receive a reward, but if he does not perform it for the benefit of his troops, it is not a heroic act. I agree not all acts of bravery should be labeled heroic. …show more content…

A warrior is willing to risk his life and inflict violence on others but may never perform an act of bravery. A warrior can be someone who fights on the front line at war or someone who pushes a button on a ship for a missile to be launched. Nevertheless, neither person is considered less of a warrior than the other, but the “button pusher” never acted bravely. I believe that everyone who serves in the war is a warrior, but not all are heroes. A suicide bomber, as used in the passage, does act bravely but is not a hero because he/she is willing to target civilians that did not do a thing to them. Moreover, I think of my late grandfather as a warrior. While fighting in World War II, his feet and hands were frozen from staying numerous days in a fox hole in France in twenty degree weather and was also wounded in the leg. Warriors are not cowards and will choose a side to fight for in a war even if an act of bravery never

Open Document