Comparing The Interaction Between The Player And The Game System

2124 Words5 Pages

The keyword in this definition, as with the others, is ’interaction’ – how the player and the game system associate to each other, and consequently ‘co behave’.
Let us adapt this definition to the theory of game elements. The ’general or specific’ interaction that Lundgren and Björk refer to equals the interaction of two or more game elements – e.g., component, environment, and the player in a board game. The key point is that this interaction is put in motion by the player or the game, and the interaction is governed by the ruleset. Understood this way, game mechanics is something that is available to both players and designers; for players to perform within the game and for designers to implement into the game in order to both afford and …show more content…

the operation of the ruleset through ruleset procedures and run of information between players and the system. Thus we can actually define the system-responses that facilitate and govern the core mechanic as the core behaviour pattern of a game system. In a game like Tetris, this pattern consists of the core mechanic of the player arranging the blocks, and the game system responding with ruleset procedures, such as producing new blocks (components) onto the game space (environment) and adding to the score (information). These are the mechanics that the system has available to it, and we see that there is a reciprocial relationship between player and system actions – this is what can be conceptualised as their co-behaviour. When the behaviour has expanded to all the players participating, in repeated fashion, there emerges a dynamics, which is the dynamics of the gaming encounter.
Both core mechanic and core behaviour pattern are useful in defining genres, as we will see in chapter 14. I will now move on to study the inner structures of the game core mechanics. In order to identify if there are popular, wide spread …show more content…

The goal of recall is to submit an answer to a question, for instance, and cognitive abilities in the domain of memory

Game mechanics are essential elements in that they are always about doing something significant in the game. In everyday experience, they are what playing a game is about. Game mechanics are best described with verbs: Choosing, guessing, moving, aiming, shooting, collecting, kicking, trading, performing, bidding, etc. Thus the nature of a mechanic, i.e. the action it conducts, might come to define the game experience as an interactive experience for the player.
For instance, jumping defines ski jumping, and guessing or knowing characterizes quiz games.
Quite often in a game there is a certain game mechanic that characterizes the game as taking choices and actions. In games with a single game mechanic, it literally is what the game is about. Submitting a stake by placing it on the table is what characterizes Roulette. Placing a stone on the grid is what characterises
Go. Moving, fighting, and conversing with characters-of-system is what characterises many digital games of the ‘adventure’ genre, such as the Legend of
Zelda (Nintendo, 1986- )series,

Open Document