Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Symbolism in Watership Down
Symbolism in Watership Down
Symbolism in Watership Down
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Watership Down” is an adventure book about rabbits written by Richard Adams. The story is a narrative that seems to be explained by one of the rabbits of the story (Shmoop Editorial Team). In “Watership Down” the author uses new terms for the rabbit’s “language”, to make the book more interesting. Furthermore, in the book there is a constant theme of family Watership Down in a commendable story for everyone. The book “Watership Down” is told in a narrative tone possibly by one of the rabbits, who found Watership Down, the new home of the rabbits, most likely, Fiver or Hazel. The book starts off with Hazel and Fiver, the protagonists, out in their warren’s field eating when suddenly Fiver has a dream of dead bodies lying across the highlands …show more content…
Some of the threats that they encountered were predators, such as dogs and cats. One of the most treacherous things that they happened upon was a warren, called Cowslip’s Warren. At first the warren seems like a great home because there was plenty of food, a multitude of muscular, healthy rabbits, and no beasts lurking about to hunt them. Soon the group of rabbits discovered the truth about Cowslip’s Warren; It was not as tranquil as they believed. Although the warren did seem safe, there were many peculiar things that happened in the “safe” warren. They would carry food with their mouths from a big pile of scraps, rabbits would go missing, they didn’t like rain, and there were bizarre disturbances in the woods of Cowslip’s Warren. Fiver tried to warn his companions that the warren was not safe, but they felt happy and chose not to attend his words. Wistfully, one of Hazel and Fiver’s companions, Bigwig, gets caught in a snare; they were able to free him. Now the eyes of the adventuring rabbits were open. All the strange things that these warren rabbits were doing made sense. The scrape food was left there on purpose to fatten the rabbits. The unusual disorders in the wood was a rabbit trying to free itself from the snare. They were all traps, so that a farmer could effortlessly get food and Cowslip’s warren knew it, but they let it go to be “safe”. Quickly, the rabbits and one of Cowslip’s rabbits escaped before it …show more content…
The book starts and end with family. There were four different families in the Watership Down. First there was the warren at the beginning of the book. Everyone was happy everything was serene, yet there was a sense of danger and no. No one wanted to leave because it was their home, and they felt safe, but when Fivers had his vision hardly anyone wanted to listen because they felt like nothing could harm them. This family didn’t seem to trust each other. Secondly, was Cowslip’s Warren where everyone seemed healthy and happy, but deep inside there was a great menace (the farmer) attacking the warren. Regardless of the danger Cowslip’s warren faced, they did nothing about it. They were willing to lose members of their family to have food and safety when they knew there were other places to make a safe home. Third, is Efrafa. Efrafa is an extremely strict family. No one was permitted to come or go, and everyone had a mark to identify them. Forlornly, Efrafa is the home that is “safe”, but not lovable. Lastly, is Watership down. It was peaceful, beautiful, and secure. The rabbits of Watership Down learn to work together, even when it was difficult, and they didn’t know what they were doing. Representing a strong, healthy, and happy family, Watership Down is an extremely ideal family to be a part of. They worked to be an amazing family, even when life was difficult. That is what a true family
appeared. He slit the bag open to find a bundle of baby rabbits, each wrapped in a “scarlet thin
' "Hazel isn't dead," said Fiver ' (Adams, 1975, p. 239). Also, without Fiver, the Chief Rabbit of Watership Down, Hazel, would have never survived without him. Hazel was alive in the storm drain after he got shot, and only Fiver knew that due to a premonition. He brought Hazel back to Watership Down to prevent dying of his wounds. This action of Fiver's exemplified the theme of survival, because without Hazel being alive, the Watership Down Warren would have lost it's greatest leader who leads them all to the ultimate goal of
The movie, Rushmore, was directed by Wes Anderson about a teenage boy Max Fischer, who is obsessive and controlling in order to get whatever he wants. Due to his narcissistic personality, he only has a few friends and his relationship with them are uneasy. The film mainly takes place around a school since Max practically lives on campus. This movie is both a comedy and a drama where they over exaggerate Max's attitude. By doing so they then make his issues humorous but also keeps the audience on their toes as Max and his friend fall in love and fight over the same girl. It is clear that Rushmore is different than most popular movies, as it has it’s own unique quirks such as Max and his strange relationships with the people he chooses to be
Life does not always work out the way it should. Sometimes good loses, and the better man is the one begging. The Water is Wide is the story of injustice abounding. While the story may have been more appealing if Pat were able to stay on at Yamacraw Island, and I would certainly have enjoyed it more if the superintendent had been beaten, that story would have been a false picture of reality, worthy only of a children's bedtime collection. I...
Hazel who is Fiver's slightly larger brother leads the pack of rabbits into a field where he believes they can live. When they get there they find out that there is already a group of rabbits living there but they let the travelers stay with them. Fiver being the smart one again warns them not to join the new warren, but once again no one listens to them again. Discovering they need more female rabbits to mate with. Two of the survivors at the warren tell of the horrible poisoning occurring out there. The overall conception of the matter is still kind of not understood totally by the rest of the crew.
There is the escape from reality, a low level job, and a way of life, in general. Each character is very relatable simply because so many people, in real life, are not happy with the way their lives are or seem to be turning out. “Mountain climbers don’t carry bricks”-Zig Ziglar. Sometimes one has to be selfish to better his or her situation. Laura wants to escape the fact that she is different and others don’t understand her. Amanda spends her time regretting her choice to marry Laura and Tom’s father who she blames for her current circumstances. She really wants her children to be happy, but maybe should spend more time thinking about what to say next. Jim has a reasonable desire for escape; a little more money, a little less work. Tom is beyond dissatisfied but wants to be responsible, but also seemingly envies his father’s escape and leaving him to be the man of the house. Williams likes to use bird imagery in his writing. Birds can symbolize freedom. They can go as they please and never look back. Tom leaves everything behind and finally escapes in the
In both their old warren and on their journey, the group of rabbits encounters urban development and the city life which relentlessly interfere with their plans. The inciting point is the cause of sub-division development ("Literature in Brief Information about Watership Down.") and humans post a notice in the field where the rabbits live that says:
Stevick, Philip. "The Full Range of Updike's Prose." New Essays on Rabbit, Run. Ed. Stanley Trachtenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 31-52.
In the newspaper article and the extract from a novel, the authors illustrate the relationships between humans and rabbits in very contrasting ways. In the extract from "Watership Down," the rabbits are personified to perform human activities; such as socializing with other rabbits, which humans would find unusual and impossible. Through rabbits, Adams can scoff at humans who cannot "sense much in a strange place where they cannot see, but with rabbits it is otherwise." Humans are also considered as shallow-thinking beings, because they don't "sense … where they cannot see," "except the courageous and experienced blind [people]." The roles of rabbits and humans have been reversed within the two texts; in the novel extract, rabbits are thinking creatures and on newspaper it's regarded as normal house pets. In the newspaper article, rabbits are considered by the journalist as the "perfect pet" and "miraculous creature" because unlike cats or dogs they are pets that need very little taking care of. Both texts also discuss how rabbits are "social creatures [from] the wild … [and] benefit greatly from … living indoors with humans." Adams explains that among themselves "rabbits mingled naturally." Again, mockery against human is being mentioned again in the extract from the novel, "[rabbits] did not talk for talking's sake, in the artificial manner that human beings - and sometimes even their dogs and cats do." Adams is trying to challenge the readers' opinion on whether humans only socialize superficially or
“The rabbits accept their role in the ritual and recognize the wolf as the strong. In defense, the rabbit becomes sly and frightened and elusive and he digs holes and hides when the wolf is about. And he endures, he goes
Robert shares a special relationship and bond with animals, in particular rabbits. The rabbits are a symbol of Rowena, not only because they were her prize possession, but also because the rabbits remind Robert of his younger sister. Both Rowena and the rabbits are characters of innocence and purity. Being considered as small, fragile and precious to those who love and look after them. Findley uses the rabbits to evoke feelings of guilt from Robert, during the constant appearances in the novel. When Rowena dies, R...
Creating monuments to memorialize the history of the United States should be heavily evaluated before action is made, for the impact on the country’s people is often greater than predicted. History is remembered and glorified through the creations of monuments such as the Lincoln Memorial as described by Kirk Savage. Therefore, it needs to be taken into consideration that the people and events chosen to be memorialized contribute to the perspective we have on the morality of these figures and their actions and once these monuments are created, our identity as a nation will consequently be affected depending on the construction of the monument. Evidently, these significances are oftentimes neglected when making said decisions.
Although The Tale of Peter Rabbit is not a ‘modern’ picturebook, and was written to a different concept of childhood than Voices in the Park, it certainly falls within Bader’s description. Susan Hill has described the events of the book as reflecting ‘the world of the Victorian nursery… Naughtiness may be understood...
The first part of the book focuses on the people and their relationships around the docks and their hometown. It gave an in-depth glimpse into the life and psychological behaviors of fishermen. Given the total length of the book my first reaction to this focus on people was that it was too much. My second reaction was "just right." Less stress would have de-personalized the characters. Towards the end the characters in the book have all learned something about themselves because of this storm. Being that some of the characters are not here anymore makes the book all the more poignant.
The Tale of Peter Rabbit was a fictional story for children written by Beatrix Potter. The main character of the story was Peter Rabbit, who had three sisters by the names of Flopsy, Mopsy, and Cotton-tail. The four bunnies lived with their mother, Mrs. Rabbit, underneath a huge tree in the woods. All the characters displayed the element of anthropomorphic because they are dressed in human clothing and display human characteristics such as walking straight up on their hind legs. The three sisters were wearing a pink to reddish cloak, Peter Rabbit a blue jacket with brown shoes, and the mother a blue chambermaid dress. While Peter Rabbit’s sisters were obedient little bunnies who gathered blackberries, Peter Rabbit was a naughty, disobedient and mischievous young rabbit who gave into temptation rather than to listen to direction.