Transnational Security Challenges

2075 Words5 Pages

Since the end of the Cold War, the concept of security has been reconceptualised among academics and policy makers to broaden the security agenda. As a result, security challenges that stem from transnational phenomena have been brought to the centre of attention for contemporary security analysts. Transnational security challenges represent various non-traditional threats to both human and national security. In order to understand how different issues become transnational security challenges, the securitisation theory will be utilised in the context of drugs and asylum seekers as transnational security challenges. Whilst both case studies prove to be effectively securitised, the validity of describing these issues as security challenges differ significantly. Drugs do have the potential to threaten human security, whilst drug trafficking can significantly threaten national security. However, refugees seeking asylum in Australia do not pose an existential threat to human or national security. Furthermore, it is important to recognise the dangers of securitisation, as the process can potentially be counterproductive for solving particular issues.

Transnational security challenges refer to various threats that operate across national boundaries and involve cross-border transference as a fundamental part of its process. These threats are complex, interconnected, non-traditional and typically involve non-state actors. Issues such as transnational organised crime, terrorism, piracy, environmental degradation and infectious disease are examples of issues at the centre of the transnational security agenda. Dupont argues that transnational issues were largely ignored by the mainstream discourse on security until the September 11 terroris...

... middle of paper ...

... is difficult to determine how different issues come to be seen as security challenges. The use of the securitisation process as a theoretical tool to analyse drugs and asylum seekers as a threat shows that certain speech acts elevate transnational issues into high politics. The analysis also shows that issues can be securitised regardless of their validity transnational security challenges. Furthermore, it can be argued that securitisation is counterproductive for solving particular transnational issues. Militarisation as a result of securitisation can often result in increased regional tensions. The broadening of the security agenda can unfortunately result in encompassing all transnational issues. It is important to seriously consider the validity of a perceived security threat before describing the issue as a transnational security challenge.

Open Document