The Suez Canal

1719 Words4 Pages

The Suez Canal was a construction of a canal to make routes shorter. More importantly the canal was a construction of many dreams, profits, and the unification of the West and the East. Lesseps and his companions began to embark on a journey with a great dream in mind. In his book Parting the Desert, Karabell not only shows the history of the construction of the Suez Canal and the unification of East and West, however also shows the destruction of many countries' hopes and dreams

Lesseps main mission was to change the political landscapes of three continents through the building of the Suez Canal. He had a vision of progression and knew with this vision that he would achieve greatness and his name would be immortalized. He thought that the Suez Canal would unite the East and the West, and that the unification would cause the world to flourish. Although the West was progressing, people believed its growth would be stunted until it was united with the East. To prevent this from happening they had to remove the physical obstacle which separated them. To accomplish his vision he was going to turn an almost abandoned dessert, which had no source of fresh water, into a canal that connected the Mediterranean with the Red Sea. The building of the Suez Canal however, was not to be an easy task to obtain, there were many obstacles along the way. Certain states of Europe aggressively competed for it, the Ottoman Empire tried to prevent its construction, and the Middle East proved to be another impediment when they destroyed the cities along its banks. However in the mid nineteenth century there was a joint venture between the ruler of Egypt and Lesseps.

Lesseps knew he could not do this alone. Muhammad Ali was an Alb...

... middle of paper ...

...at their expense. Egypt's past situation when Egypt was exploited for European trade, and when another country took over, is parallel to today's situation. When the US is taking over politically and affecting them economically for oil. Both times the Middle East was imposed upon without their consent.

In conclusion, for the future, foreign policy makers could have learned from the Suez Canal. Current policy makers would have looked to see the past and would have known things aren't as easy as they appear, and to not impose on a country without justification. They would have seen that in the past, western countries have exploited the Middle East, and perhaps they would have thought more of the already pent up resentment already present and not opened up a big can of worms. History repeats itself as another Western country exploits the Middle East again.

More about The Suez Canal

Open Document