The Silence Of The Lambs Film Analysis

1377 Words3 Pages

In the film, The Silence of the Lambs, Clarice Starling is a rookie FBI agent in the training academy; her superior, Jack Crawford, wants her to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a psychopath who is serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling may be able to obtain his help. The case Sterling is assigned to solve with the help of Lecter is about a psychopath known as ‘Buffalo Bill’; he kidnaps young women across the Midwest, holds them captive for a few days, and then murders and skins them. Although initially pleasant and courteous, Lecter grows impatient with Starling's attempts at "dissecting" him and viciously rebuffs her. As Starling departs, another patient assaults Staring, which enrages Lecter. He calls Starling back to his cell and offers a riddle containing information about a former patient. The solved riddle leads to a rent-a-storage lot where the severed head of Benjamin Raspail is found. Starling returns to Lecter, who links Raspail to Buffalo Bill and who offers to help profile Buffalo Bill if he is transferred to a facility far from the venomous, careerist Dr. Chilton. Miles away, Buffalo Bill tricks and abducts Catherine Martin, the
I think it’s so smart and well done, it makes me believe that its real life. Another reason why I picked this film was because I want to be in law enforcement; the idea of someone like Clarice Starling being able to survive and accomplish what she did, gives me hope that I will be able to as well. One of the final reasons for picking The Silence of the Lambs is because I believe many sociological theories can explain parts of the story line. Two social theories I want to connect to the film are Jean-Jacqes Rousseau’s theory, that man is “good” in nature, and the polar opposite; Aristotle, and his theory that man is “bad” in

More about The Silence Of The Lambs Film Analysis

Open Document