Sex could be considered the most pleasurable occurrence by a whole lot of people. But is it really as good as it seems? Chocolate is one of the most well-known treats loved by the majority of the world. Surprisingly, studies show that chocolate stimulates more love than sex and is actually four times better. Although it sounds unusual, it actually makes sense when considering what chemical compounds and amino acids take place in chocolate. Crazy enough, experimental data and a poll taken by women deciding whether or not chocolate is better than sex shows that chocolate is indeed, better than intimacy.
A study led by Dr. David Lewis, a neuropathologist, included the process of obtaining young adults, who had intimate partners, and connecting
…show more content…
Amazingly, "According to a new Harris Interactive Poll, French women said that eating chocolate can be even more pleasurable than having sex" (Womenshealthmag). However, it isn't just women thinking this way. Not as much as women, but men also chose this delicious candy over coitus. In comparison, 57 percent of women confirmed that they would rather cut back on sex rather than food, while only 39 percent of men claimed the same. In addition, Cadbury Chocolate also brought forth a survey and "announced with great fanfare that more than half the women in the UK would rather curl up with a chocolate bar than let a man" (Daniel). Therefore, women from different places in the world tend to agree that intercourse is not as pleasurable as eating …show more content…
Chocolate is known for "containing a ‘Love Drug’ because it triggers feelings of euphoria, attraction, and excitement, mimicking the brain chemistry of a person in love. Also, it contains approximately 380 known chemicals, some promote serotonin production which boosts our mood and eases depression" (Realfoodforlife). Thus, it seems reasonable for men and women to fall in love with the exquisite goody and to turn to it after a heartbreak or a time when a person is feeling depressed. As a result of chocolate releasing these chemicals during ingestion, it is likely for the consumption of chocolate to also increase sexual desire, making better bed partners. "Female participants who consumed at least one cube of chocolate a day experienced more active libidos and better overall sexual function than those who didn't indulge" ("Eat Chocolate for Better Sex"), which indicates that chocolate is better than it
People are not prone to agree with one another. If you gather a dozen people together for a dinner party and the subject turns to politics or religion, then there is inevitably going to be an argument. There is one thing, however, that there is a near universal consensus on: chocolate is a wonderful and delicious thing.
The underlying difference in both cases is the fact that water is basic amenity of life while chocolate is merely a luxury (Child Slavery and the Chocolate Factory, 2007).
Can true love defeat all the odds? This seems to be the main question going throughout Laura Esquivel’s, “ Like Water For Chocolate”. This story takes place in Mexico, with a young woman named Tita trying to be with her love, Pedro. With Mother Elena upholding family tradition it seems Tita will never find true happiness.
Chocolate is a food in the form of a paste or solid block made from roasted and ground cacao seeds. As suspected, its name is derived
2nd ed. New York: Thames and Hudson, 2007. Print. Boynton, Sandra. Chocolate, the consuming passion.
Masters and Johnson were a pioneering team in the field of human sexuality, both in the domains of research and therapy. William Howell Masters, a gynecologist, was born in Cleveland, Ohio in 1915. Virginia Eshelman Johnson, a psychologist, was born in Springfield, Montana in 1925. To fully appreciate their contribution, it is necessary to see their work in historic context. In 1948, Alfred C. Kinsey and his co-workers, responding to a request by female students at Indiana University for more information on human sexual behavior, published the book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. They followed this five years later with Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. These books began a revolution in social awareness of and public attention given to human sexuality. At the time, public morality severely restricted open discussion of sexuality as a human characteristic, and specific sexual practices, especially sexual behaviors that did not lead to procreation. Kinsey's books, which among other things reported findings on the frequency of various sexual practices including homosexuality, caused a furor. Some people felt that the study of sexual behavior would undermine the family structure and damage American society. It was in this climate - one of incipient efforts to break through the denial of human sexuality and considerable resistance to these efforts - that Masters and Johnson began their work. Their primary contribution has been to help define sexuality as a healthy human trait and the experience of great pleasure and deep intimacy during sex as socially acceptable goals. As a physician interested in the nature of sexuality and the sexual experience, William Masters wanted to conduct research that would lead to an objective understanding of these topics. In 1957, he hired Virgina Johnson as a research assistant to begin this research issue. Together they developed polygraph-like instruments that were designed to measure human sexual response. Using these tools, Masters and Johnson initiated a project that ultimately included direct laboratory observation and measurement of 700 men and women while they were having intercourse or masturbating. Based on the data collected in this study, they co-authored the book Human Sexual Response in 1966. In this book, they identify and describe four phases in the human sexual response cycle : excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution. By this point in time, the generally repressive attitude toward sexuality was beginning to lift and the book found a ready audience.
Liddle, H A., Rowe, C L., Dakof, G A., Henderson, C E., Greenbaum, P E.; (Feb, 2009). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology; Vol 77(1); 12-25. Doi: 10.1177/0306624X10366960
Chocolate made the journey from Mesoamerica to Spain, and then to other European countries, including England. Not long after the sweetness was tasted in London, it traveled across the Atlantic to the North American colonies. It is possible to have traveled there directly from Jamaica after the island had been seized from Spain. However, the most genuine explanation is that high Colonial officials carried it with them when they were assigned to their administrative posts in Virginia and Massachusetts.
In 2013, about 7.4 million tons of chocolate is expected to be consumed globally, totaling to nearly $110 billion (Pardomuan, Nicholson). I can honestly say that I will be one of the many people who contribute immensely to those massive quantities. Chocolate has always been one of my guilty pleasures, leading me to consider myself a “chocoholic.” After 20 years of eating chocolate, I learned there is more to chocolate than meets the eye. Many chemicals compose each delicious piece creating multiple psychological effects on the mind. With the knowledge of the chemical and psychological influences that chocolate has on the human mind and body and my own curiosity as to why I love it so much, this led me to ask: Why is chocolate considered such a pleasurable and craveable food?
THERE’s much more to sex than the genitals, seeing someone bare or even the most common goal of sex – an orgasm. Sex experts will tell you that sex is intimacy; it is opening yourselves to spiritual mingling, exposing and exploring your sexual desires. But these are sometimes hindered by social constructions of sexual behaviour – the taboos, the myths and misinformation can sometimes make something as natural as sex very complex.
The Brain in Love by Daniel G. Amen; just from the introduction of the book I was already able to tell the book was going to be a great read. Amen starts the book by giving statements which to me sounded like statements of when a person is in love with another. Some example, “You beat in my heart. I crave you. I need you next to men.” (Amen, The Brain in Love, pg 1). Amen states that the brain is the largest sex organ and that size does matter when it comes to sex. Our brains help us with everything like who we find attractive, how well we do on a date or how to even deal with a breakup. He also explains the while in a relationship you brain will work either good or bad. When the brain is working go within a relationship a person tends to be more playful, thoughtful, and loving to his/her partner. When the brain is “acting up” in a relationship a person may be impulsive, hateful, and angry. Also, since the brain is known as the “largest sex organ” the size of the brain does matter and, as male/females get older the brain active and size begins to decrease; with the decrease of both brain active and size which was why sexual desire will decrease within age and in men 40% of men in their forties and 70% of men in their seventies had Erectile Dysfunction. Aging within women menopause was the negative affect of sexual interest and performance.
Also, Erikson’s Intimacy versus Isolation theory explained that young adults at this stage will think about being intimate or having a close relationship with a person (Miller, 1983). This could be a friend who they can confide in or a sexual partner (Miller, 1983). Those who engage in marriage at a you...
We expect the results of this study to agree with our hypothesis. After comparing the scores for all three measures for both men and women, we expect to see a decrease in the desire for sexual variety for men in all three measures and no change in sexual variety for women after close relationships. According to the research presented at the beginning of this proposal, we have found that men and women do differ in their desire for sexual variety, but because they share similarities in their relationship values, men are affected by close relationships.
The market can be further divided according to gender because both men and women have different tastes (chocolate shapes, packaging, and type of liquor). It is known that women are already consuming chocolate. In fact, the numbers of women that consume chocolate far outnumber the numbers of men that consume chocolate. It follows that there is a ready market for the commodity in question. Nonetheless, the reality that introducing alcohol to make liquor-filled chocolates increases the market.
There is nothing any better than a good piece of chocolate. Its rich, its creamy, its smooth, and it makes us feel so-o-o-o good for a few moments of course, that is; until the guilt of the calories kick in. Chocolate happens to be one of my favorite sweets. The wonderful creamy milk chocolate, bittersweet chocolate, white chocolate, or even my personal favorite a silky dark chocolate, the choices are hard. I sat down this weekend to really think about, and compare the differences. I compared my two favorite types of chocolate, milk chocolate, and dark chocolate. Milk chocolate is usually paired with nuggets, nuts, creams or caramels, but the dark chocolate is best with a wine such as a Muscat Canelli. Either makes a great desert, treat, or snack for anyone.