The Pros And Cons Of Freedom In America

The idea of freedom, that America, founded its principles on, has not always successfully held up. Undoubtedly when our country first started, we had the idea in mind, that our constitution would protect the needs of its people, even as those needs alter; therefore it’s wording needed to be, ductile and interpretive. In recent years, this plasticity has become functional and fair, yet in the past, politicians used it to give and revoke, power, to and from people. Prior to the civil war, though it helped spark many of the social/civil revolution we know today, liberty and freedom were a luxury enjoyed by a few people. Woman, non-whites, and low-income people had their liberties denied, questioned or altogether abolished. However these same groups

The right to vote went to the land holding male of the family, all-though in many instances women were capable of swaying their husband’s opinions. Women were not the furthest from liberty, though they were still subject to man’s will. “As factories began to do many of the things women had done at home previously, such as spinning and weaving, women were left with a little time to devote to other projects.” Other projects, including: education, protection of women and later women’s suffrage. Laws did not protect women from their husband’s the way they act today; when a woman married, she lost control of her rights, under coverture: “that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband: under whose wing… she performs everything.” Safeguards did exist, that kept men from treating women outside of their station, however women had no protection, financially, from their husband’s poor decisions. Unmarried women were starting to become a common occurrence in the years leading up to the civil war. “They had the legal right to live where they pleased, and

These slave “fathers” killed, and tortured their “children”, just like the wolf found a way to justify, eating the newborn lamb, undeterred by its innocence. Slaves face further mistreatment through the three-fifths compromise, in which three in every five slaves count as citizens towards the population of the state; the aforementioned compromise, allowed southerners to disregard the slave’s human rights, in a legal sense. In the Dred Scott case, a famous case in which a slave sued for his freedom, Chief Justice Roger Taney declared: “Dred Scott had no legal standing in court because blacks could not be citizens of the United States.” In the years leading up to the war an abolitionist’s movement was starting in the north that openly spoke out against slavery, but it was still not the popular idea. While most northerners were anti-slavery, they still had issue with race, making them more in favor of slavery not spreading to northern