Comparing The Individualization Of Elizabeth Bennet In Pride And Prejudice

2345 Words5 Pages

The Individualization of Elizabeth Bennet in Pride and Prejudice

Midway through Pride and Prejudice, Elizabeth Bennet arrives at a moment of self-awakening which, notably, results from the influence of someone else: Fitzwilliam Darcy. For critic Susan Fraiman, this complication amounts to no less than, as she titles her article, "The Humiliation of Elizabeth Bennet." From this moment forward, according to Fraiman, Elizabeth Bennet ceases to think for herself. She submits to Darcy as to a second father, relinquishes her trust in her own judgments, and thereby suffers a "loss of clout."1 This pivotal moment comes because, after Elizabeth has rejected his proposal, Darcy justifies himself in a lengthy letter. It is true …show more content…

Susan Fraiman would have it that "Darcy's determination to inflict seems matched by Elizabeth's to be afflicted," and that by using Elizabeth's ill-founded accusations as evidence, Darcy so emotionally humiliates Elizabeth for having rejected him that "they coincide in their enthusiasm for her humiliation."4 Unfortunately, Fraiman chooses to back up her point with the following quotation:

How despicably have I acted!' she cried.-"I, who have prided myself on my discernment!-I, who have valued my abilities! Who often disdained the generous candour of my sister, and gratified my vanity, in useless or blameable distrust.-How humiliating this discovery!-Yet, how just a humiliation! (137, italics mine)

Although Elizabeth's "humiliation" is clearly painful, she does not revel in it. She neither wallows in her shame nor lashes out in anger; instead, she immediately moves on. Fraiman ignores the power of Elizabeth's full cry; because Elizabeth is able to admit the justice of Darcy's painful revelations, she is able to deal objectively with her mistake. And by justly recognizing she has done wrong, she ascends out of her "humiliation" and beyond her ego to the clear mindedness of "a judgment...unassailed by any attention to herself" …show more content…

Any pain she experiences is pain that she bravely inflicts upon herself because she knows that she is able to overcome such pain. Therefore, however highly Elizabeth esteems Jane's decorum, she can now realize that Jane's "complacency in her air and manner" (137) has indirectly resulted in the injustice she has erroneously imputed to Darcy: Bingley's departure from Netherfield. Early in the novel, Elizabeth has ignored her friend Charlotte's warning that Jane's circumspect manner has driven off Bingley: "Bingley likes your sister undoubtedly; but he may never do more than like her, if she does not help him on" (15). Later, when Colonel Fitzwilliam informs Elizabeth that Darcy has encouraged Bingley to leave Jane and move to London, Elizabeth has assumed that Darcy snobbishly wishes to protect Bingley from Jane's inferior position in society. On the contrary, Darcy explains to Elizabeth in his letter, his genuine concern is for Bingley's feelings as opposed to Bingley's status. Observing Jane's behavior towards his friend, Darcy believes that she is not in love with Bingley. By releasing Bingley from what Darcy thinks is a match based in unreciprocated affection, Darcy honestly has his friend's best interest in mind. It is in reviewing Jane's past conduct, that Elizabeth now comes to the painful conclusion that

Open Document