The Film Food Inc.

1164 Words3 Pages

Would you rather have food available for everyone with the possibility of diseases or having a possible food shortage, but the food will be safe to eat? How about changing the way food is produce or keeping it the same? In the film Food Inc., Robert Kenner tires to answer these conversational questions by examining corporate farms across America. Kenner shows the industrial production of meat where some people are okay with feeding animals antibiotics while others are not because it causes the meat to be unhealthy. The problem that arises is whether or not the mass production of food is abusive for the animals causing the food to become unhealthy. If this is true and the mass production of is abusive and makes the food unhealthy then the Food …show more content…

Some people may argue that the mass production of food is the only way to feed all of the people in the United States and they would rather say that the food in healthy so everyone would have access to food. On the other hand the abuse of animals and the safety of your food does hand in hand; if there is a poor treatment of animals then you can not expect your food to be healthy. In Food Inc. the cow industry was shown as the industry that was most unhealthy and it was not the fact that multiple cows make up a single hamburger, it was the threat of E. coli that made it unhealthy. Cows naturally have E Coli in their stomachs, but because of the mass production of cows, it caused more E Coli to grow in their stomachs. Like chickens, cows are fed feed that is not supposed to be in their diet just to make them grow fast. Cows who are natural herbivores are fed corn instead of grass by corporate farms, mostly because it is cheap, but corn causes more E. coli to grow in their stomachs. E.coli is then transmitted to humans by ingesting cow meat like hamburgers that has been infected by E. coli. In a study done by the Center for Disease Control has concluded that 73,000 people in the United States will get sick from E. coli alone in a year. Michael Pollan from Food Inc. showed how dangerous corn was to cow's diet by saying “ if we took cows off of a corn diet for five …show more content…

People think that since the FDA is a government organization then it has to be aware and fix these problems. Also they think that they FDA would be more strict on the corporate farms then the small farms.The abuse of animals and the safety of your food does hand in hand; if there is a poor treatment of animals then you can not expect your food to be healthy. In Food Inc. the cow industry was shown as the industry that was most unhealthy and it was not the fact that multiple cows make up a single hamburger, it was the threat of E. coli that made it unhealthy. Cows naturally have E Coli in their stomachs, but because of the mass production of cows, it caused more E Coli to grow in their stomachs. Like chickens, cows are fed feed that is not supposed to be in their diet just to make them grow fast. Cows who are natural herbivores are fed corn instead of grass by corporate farms, mostly because it is cheap, but corn causes more E. coli to grow in their stomachs. E.coli is then transmitted to humans by ingesting cow meat like hamburgers that has been infected by E. coli. In a study done by the Center for Disease Control has concluded that 73,000 people in the United States will get sick from E. coli alone in a year. Michael Pollan from Food Inc. showed how dangerous corn was to cow's diet by saying “ if we took cows off of a corn diet for

Open Document