Documentary Analysis Of Robert Kenner's 'Food Inc.'

1036 Words3 Pages

FOOD Inc. is a film that goes deeper into the food that we consume every single day, and also gives us insight on the origin of our food from the average farmer to the corporations that have almost made a monopoly in agriculture. However, Robert Kenner exposes the corrupt ways food companies treat animals and the way food is being produced, and overall, the need to make our voices heard that we need to make a change when it comes to what we eat and how we eat. Therefore I agree with the documentarian on his point of view on the way animals are being treated, the way our food is really being made, our health, and its effect on our lives. While analyzing this documentary, you notice that the food being shown in the film was a clear contrast on what we usually see on television and other forms of media. It mainly started at how our food is being produced from the feeding of animals to our local grocery, and you see how we are being deceived into thinking that they actually care about our consumption, however, they care about the money that is being made. I agreed with Kenner because he gave insight on something that was not shown in our lives. We did not know about how chickens, and cows are put into these warehouses and are being fed corn since it is so cheap. Another argument that Kenner made was the facts of the …show more content…

The further you learned about the situation, not only did the corporation not get in trouble, but instead, made a hamburger filler that contained harsh chemicals such as ammonia, to get rid of bacteria in the meat. This was a very strong argument for Kenner because corporations should not have to go to so many extremes in order to keep with their plan. Instead they should just change their ways and create a better way to produce their food and instead of doing it for money, they should do it for the health of

Open Document