Swot Analysis Of Workhorse

633 Words2 Pages

In the beginning, we choose the Workhorse to become our first target market, and the Traveler has been our second target market. However, we didn’t get a successful sale at the beginning since our brand does not meet the needs of Workhorse and we had a very poor rating of our advertising for our target market even though we have a cheapest price in market. After a few quarters, we try to modify our brand and we find the Traveler may has high demand of our brand since we design a new brand for them, so we change the Traveler to be the first target market and the Workhorse move to second.
Our company designed three separate brands for our target markets. The first one is designed for Workhorse called Veloce Prime, which is a desktop with ultra capacity hard drive, ultra fast of computing power and high-speed networking. For software, it has office upgrade, presentation; database; engineering and manufacturing. Also, it has a stylish case, 19" standard monitor and expanded keyboard. The price of this product is $2500 and customers can get a $300 price rebate. To appeal Workhorse to choose our product, we made an advertisement to show it’s easy to use and we have local service and support. But it is not very work for this brand; there are total 2194 demands of this brand that 50 demands from Workhorse and 2144 demands from Mercedes and 0 demand form Traveler. We are unexpected that this brand didn’t get high demand from Workhorse but got 2144 from Mercedes, which was not our target market. To comparison this brand with our competitor’s, their brands are more to meet need of Workhorse than our brand. Thus, Workhorse was preferred to purchase the product from our competitor’s that is more matches for them.
...

... middle of paper ...

...design are lower than other competitor’s. For example, they have ultra fast computing power but our brand just has high speed computing power. Thence, some competitors which Workhorse chose their product are just they want and need.
For sale force, we total spent $250,00 of sales office costs in two cities which is, Paris-EMEA and Shanghai-APAC that we found those two cities both have sufficient market size for our target market. The largest market size is in the Paris-EMEA which can both meet all customers need. In the Paris-EMEA, we hired total 6 people in the Paris-EMEA that 2 people for Support, 2 people for Workhorse and 2 people for Traveler. Be compared with Paris-EMEA, Shanghai-APAC doesn’t have a larger market size, but we still hire 7 people in the Shanghai-APAC, and we let 2 people for Support, 3 people for Workhouse and 2 people for Traveler.

Open Document