Summary Of The Mega-Marketing Of Depression In Japan

1495 Words3 Pages

Consciousness is awareness of one’s thoughts and emotions, as well as perception of one’s surroundings and the world. People from different nations have distinct consciousness of various subject matters including politics, medicine, and social conscience. These differences are healthy, and they constitute an integral part of human nature. Nevertheless, Watters’ “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan” is an example of instances when differences in consciousness can raise a flag. In Watters’ story, while the Western conception of depression is a severe feeling of sadness and anxiety, many Japanese perceive depression as a simple disease that does not require much attention, which could lead to further health complications.
People from different …show more content…

In Japan, drug makers published advertisements in newspapers to “alter the environment in which anti-depressant drugs are or may be used…and promote the idea of depression as a common ailment” (Watters 524). As depression has been believed to be incurable, drug makers argued that this disease was equivalent to a cold of the soul or kokoro no kaze. They also published articles in magazines and included statistics showing how many Japanese suffered from depression. The articles asserted that depression has been ubiquitous just like colds. Sometimes, a medical company may extremely underestimate the effects of a disease that the population would think it does not require medication. This approach, in turn, leads to questioning the legitimacy of their actions and the real motives behind their advertisements. Companies must be aware of what and how they communicate to people, because by frequently exposing the public to a certain idea or concept, it becomes unconsciously ingrained in the public subconscious. The public perception of depression in Japan has led to severe consequences, including an increasing suicide rates, “lost man-hours and decreased productivity” (Watters 526). As suicide rates increased, drug makers embraced a difference approach, modified their advertisements, …show more content…

Drugs must be researched and tried clinically before being made available to the public. The GlaxoSmithKline drug makers claimed that depression was caused by low levels of serotonin in the brain and that SSRIs restore the balance of the brain chemistry. Furthermore, GlaxoSmithKline sponsored professional medical researchers and psychiatrists to research the effects of SSRIs, and rewarded researchers who found positive results, which is considered unethical and immoral in the world of pharmaceutics and medical research. As most findings proved SSRIs effective, GlaxoSmithKline executives viewed themselves as fighters of depression. However, Professor Applebaum from the University of Wisconsin states that these companies seemed to “believe their products were effective and they were baffled that anyone should question their value” (Watters 528). Nevertheless, the GlaxoSmithKline, after years of advertising depression medication, found out that no scientific evidence proved the link between depression and serotonin depletion, or the role of SSRIs in balancing the brain’s chemistry. Scientists found that SSRIs actually reshape the brain’s chemistry, which leads to the conclusion that these anti-depressant drugs should have not

Open Document