Summary Of Lori Clune's Executing The Rosenbergs

788 Words2 Pages

Lori Clune, in Executing the Rosenbergs: Death and Diplomacy in a Cold War World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), effectively argues that the role of America to prove that it is an anti-communist country during the Cold War pushed the country to its limits when it comes to the potential propaganda opportunities. As well as the cause and effect of executing the Rosenbergs, an American Jewish family, convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage for the Soviet Union, which resulted in a detrimental image that led to consequences for the United States on the international stage. In her research, Dr. Clune uses multiple types of sources, both primary and secondary. Dr. Clune’s basis of her argument stemmed from the discovery of missing …show more content…

The Truman administration had used this case to set a precedent not only at home in the United States but also abroad as their stance against communism. Clune uses this initial beginning to show that the case was essentially used as a piece of propaganda for the country to wield to the international stage to promote the United States’ strong democracy and condemn the acts of communism. She does this by showcasing that the case against both of the Rosenbergs’ was weaker than the American government had portrayed it; but in order to help keep the image of a strong anti-communist country, the case was manipulated to help fit the propaganda mold that the United States needed in order to help boost its declining international …show more content…

“Latin Americans pushed opposition to the execution further, labeling the persecution of the couple as bullying and proof of United States imperialism (Clune, 103).” This was a standard reaction to the Rosenberg case on the international level. The viewpoints about the actions of the United States varied from whether one was looking from the outside into America, or from America to the outside world. Clune spends a large part of her book putting this in perspective; on one hand the American government saw many if not most of the opposition to the decision coming from communist based groups. While on the international playing field, many groups both communist based and non-communist based disagree with the political flexing that America does in order to prove to the world that America is anti- communist. In the end, it came to be noted that the Rosenbergs’ case was propaganda for the United States to showcase democratic

Open Document