Speech About Immigration In America

858 Words2 Pages

There is so much discussion about the effects immigration is having on our American society. Let’s step back from all of that. I’m going to tell you a story about a different category of immigrants and their impact on our state’s riparian systems and Garden State history. The immigrants, packed into the damp hold of the German steamship Werra, were not particularly welcome when they made landfall in the United States on February 24, 1883. Xenophobic feelings were running high, with many Americans worried that the Europeans would displace residents already struggling to stay afloat. These newcomers were being described as voracious and monstrous. It was said that they would steal food from the native populations and even eat their young. …show more content…

The consequences of their arrival are felt—on the riverbank, in public hearing rooms, and in hatcheries—to this very day. Indeed, it is not too far fetched to suggest that the ongoing story of trout in American waters—native and introduced, threatened and thriving—is a fair reflection of our own restless history, with its marathon migrations, its outbursts of prejudice, its well-intentioned blunders and its reassuring urge to set those blunders right again. It began, suitably, with a fishing trip. Fred Mather, a United States delegate to the Berlin Fish Cultural Exposition of 1880, visited the Black Forest, where he was delighted to catch a few brown trout with his host, the Baron Friedrich Felix von Behr, president of the German Fish Culturists Association. Mather, a founding father of fish propagation in the New World, was determined to import brown trout to …show more content…

When the fish arrived, Mather took them to a fish nursery at Long Island’s Cold Spring Harbor. Some were allowed to develop into fry, others were dispatched to hatcheries in Caledonia, New York, and still others to the U.S. Fish Commission station in Northville, Michigan. These fish and their progeny -- reinforced with shipments from Germany, England and Scotland -- were released into the rivers of their adoptive homeland and were soon thriving in streams from New England to the Rockies. They spawned, they grew fat, they ate their young, and, yes, they did exactly as predicted — they pushed aside the native brook trout of the East. Brown trout grew bigger and more violent than brook trout, were adapted to warmer water, and were fiercely territorial, sending their native cousins scooting upstream in search of a new place to call home stream home. Not that there were many brook trout left to harass by then anyway. The 1880s brought about the brook trout population plunge not through other fish, but through the impact of Homo sapiens. As cities and towns grew in the years following the Civil War, forests were felled for timber, rivers were made into logging runs, and towering hemlocks were axed for tanneries. Brook trout, scientifically known as Salvelinus fontinalis, or the “little salmon of the fountain,”

Open Document