Social Inequality In Canada Case Study

1643 Words4 Pages

Introduction
One certainty regarding Canada’s diverse labour market is that, simply, some jobs are better than others, and specific people/groups experience exclusion from obtaining the good ones. Various factors such as work hours, wages, benefits, required education/skills, as well as mobility and security, determine a job’s status. Permanent, full-time, well-compensated (secure) positions fall into the “better” category, while precarious (unreliable and/or unpredictable), part-time, temporary, low-wage, benefits-absent jobs fall into the “bad” one. Complicating this labour market division is the prevalence of inequality within the market(s), driven by historical precedents and ongoing market standards which marginalize workers based on gender, …show more content…

Racialized groups tend to be underrepresented in the primary market and experience isolation in the secondary market due to inequality, both facts which emphasize a lack of social integration (Critoph, 2013, Unit 3). Government/employer focus on accommodating persons with disabilities does not address issues of institutionalization, segregation, or exclusion that accompany their labour market experience (Critoph, 2013, Unit 3). Aboriginal workers have a low participation rate in the labour market (which may be attributed to lower levels of education), which socially and economically exclude them (Critoph, 2013, Unit 3). Older workers refusing to leave the labour force create obstacles for younger workers to attain those secure jobs (Critoph, 2013, Unit 3). Youth seem to face working conditions that experienced workers do not have to endure, which translates to fewer learning and/or advancement opportunities (Critoph, 2013, Unit 3). A “history of employment in marginal jobs” for these groups creates a cycle for the lack of mobility between labour market sectors (Krahn et al, 2012, p. 142). Subsequently, the stress and conditions associated with nonstandard work and the insecurity it creates are also “associated …show more content…

1, 41). Legislation created to support standard work arrangements has not been modified to support the changes in work currently. Nonstandard work causes insecurity in numerous ways, including exemption from the protections offered by employment standards and labour legislation (Critoph, 2013, Unit 3). Governments have created a regulatory framework that adds to the insecure, unequal labour market, securing management rights while decreasing social supports and overlooking below-poverty level minimum wages (Critoph, 2013, Unit

Open Document