Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis singin in the rain song
Singing in the rain film analysis
Singing in the rain analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis singin in the rain song
While many of the great pieces of art do their best to tear at the issues of their contemporary times, a few great works simply go out of their way to be a ton of fun. Singin’ in the Rain is one of those works, an upbeat musical about the transition from silent to sound pictures. Featuring incredibly colorful numbers and a simple but effective plot about recognition, it is one of the most fun movies to just sit down and watch.
There is a certain art in being cheerful that is harder to achieve than drama. Happiness is an emotion that is hard to fully accept when presented in a fictional form. Every measure of Singin’ in the Rain is layered with bona fide joy. Gene Kelly, Donald O’Connor, and Debbie Reynolds simply seem happy to be there entertaining us. Musical numbers always have a carefree joviality, whether it is Kelly on his lonesome stomping through the rain or the trio dancing in a living room. It is one of the first color films to really make a statement with the technology, showing that there is a picturesque quality available that black and white lacks, even if they lose out on the effects of shadows. One number is a parade of various women in costumes, a sequence that simply couldn’t work without color. It is a pretty film, even to this day, being more aware of its colors than most modern films.
…show more content…
Debbie Reynolds plays Kathy Selden, a woman brought into a film production to voice the leading lady, who had the physical qualities necessary for a silent film but a voice that would instantly kill her career when sound comes in. It is a question of due credit. Why doesn’t Selden deserve the credit for being the voice of the star? She is instead forced to hide it away, being an integral part of the production but not of its
On the TV show, The Movie Show, David Stratton described the film as a “bold and timely film about the stolen generations.” The film is so highly rated for its amazing plot, the well-used mise en scene and the film techniques including the camera work and sound.
These three aspects combined made this film the classic that it is. Even though this film didn’t have any color in it whatsoever, this film was still effective because the viewer could focus on the plot and the depth of the characters with the excellent uses of cinematography, mise en scene and editing. The overall dysfunctional but also compelling storyline in The Lady From Shanghai was more apparent because of the black and white nature of this film and therefore this film will be a timeless film for years to
... still funny look into our recent history. With important issues that apply not only to the time the movie was made but possibly to our present and our future it offers a warning against war controlled culture and nuclear proliferation. This and the other themes of the movies are still worth considering today. The levels of hidden imagery in the film make it worth watching multiple times to try to find more of the levels and then to try to integrate them into the overall story. Like a painting by Dali you feel that every new thing you uncover has another waiting below it. The camera angles and lighting are tied into the film to turn the whole story into a smooth flowing work that is more pleasing to watch in black and white than most movies are in color. The overacting makes a few scenes in to movie difficult to watch but the rest of the film picks up the slack.
I am not a big fan of black and white movies. They don’t interest me, especially because they are mysterious and dark most of the time. At the beginning I did not take much interest in it because I was confused of what was happening and why it was happening. After reviewing it with the class the beginning made sense, so the second time I was more focused on the movie than the first time where I was just in blank about it.
I see now after reading Oklahoma why this musical has remained so popular throughout the years. I’ve always found it easier to watch a musical as opposed to reading one. However, the lively, upbeat tempo of the musical really made me feel that I was watching it.
The reason I attained this belief is that it is one of the most celebrated films of all time.People who watch it today still enjoy it and talk many things about it with other people. They used methods that the present audience would consider low-level today but were ahead of their time, especially with the special effects that were put in place. The performances done by the actors were so excellent that they are still remembered today for their work on this movie. Even, today, official reviews from organizations like Rotten Tomatoes gives very positive films. The film puts the present audience into awe over the effects in the aspects that are musical, graphics, and a plot that is made before the present audience was even
The costume designs throughout the movie were ancient designs with a modern touch to them. The fight scene choreography was state of the art if you turned your head for one minute you were going to miss an eye popping move. The flying that the characters had the ability to do reminds me of the cinematography they used in the Matrix.
The film itself look ahead of its time and was ground breaking however there were many down falls such as horrible lip sinking and movement like the voice will speak but the lips won’t necessarily sync with what they are saying and the movement is stiff, also the color in the film is dull. The film itself in 1937 would have looked amazing, because no one had seen such an artwork, nowadays teenagers and adults of this era would look at it as just another film, audience at the time would have been families and young children. Now more just children since adults aren’t that interested as much as they used
The portrayal of art cinema is to some extent accurate when considering the time period of this film. Art film was first introduced to the American film industry during the period of time when this film came out. Art cinema utilizes its own set of artistic expression. Hollywood classical films on the other hand, are at odds with the artistic concept, and are considered to be mainstream. When we look at Classical films, we think of the basic Hollywood movie where there is a beginning, middle and end, and the whole movie comes together at the end, with a little bit of romance. In this specific movie, the audience is faced with a confusing dilemma of choosing whether this movie is an art film or a classical film. Most even think it has a documentary approach, but what makes this movie even more successful and even more entertaining, is that it is both art cinema and classical cinema.
Singin’ in the Rain adheres to these conventions, chronicling Don Lockwood’s transition into a new age of film. The threat of a prematurely ended career truly challenges Lockwood, while Lina Lamont acts as corporealization of this antagonistic force. The resolution sees the acquisition of Lockwood’s goals: The Singing Cavalier proves successful, and he goes on to star in a film with Kathy, a true romantic interest. Lockwood’s drastic transition from an imaginary high-pro...
With the help of superb editing, sound, mise en scene, and cinematography, this film cannot be topped. The fist scene of the movie creates an atmosphere that helps the viewer know that he/she will enjoy this wonderful classic. Throughout the movie there are surprises and fun that makes this a movie that people will want to watch again and again. Gene Kelly said it best when he said, "Dignity, always dignity. " That is what this movie has from beginning to end, dignity.
The genre i have studied is musicals. A musical is a film which has musical performances from the actors to express their feelings. The films from this genre that i studied are 'Singin' In The Rain' (Gene Kelly and Stanley Donen, 1952), 'Grease' (Randall Kleiser, 1978) and 'Hairspray'(Adam Shankman, 2007). I studied two characteristics of the musical genre (Breaking Into Song And Dance and The Grande Finale) that are shown in the films studied. The identifying characteristics of 'Breaking Into Song And Dance' and 'The Grande Finale" are always seen in musicals. These characteristics are expected to be in a musical by the audience and ultimately make a musical what we predict it to be, a film that expresses characters feelings through song while
Music can decipher a narrative event by indicating a perspective. To unify a set of diverse images and provide rhythmic and formal continuity and momentum, a film’s structure is more often than not, directly articulated by a musical structure. Music can assist the dialogue and visuals of film and often is inaudible (e.g. music is meant to be heard unconsciously, not consciously). Music has been used by directors to reinforce or strengthen certain weak scenes in film and then on the other hand when music is not needed to reinforce a scene
The importance of music in movies is highly regarded for manipulating the viewer’s emotions and helping them immerse into the story. Music is one of the prime elements in cinema. Without it a movie would feel dull and unexciting. There are three elements in a movie: one is acting, the second is picture, and the third one is music. It is a holy trinity; if incomplete, there would be a lack of sensation and excitement. Both acting and picture can stand independently from one another, but music is the one that makes the movie memorable.