Similarities Between 'Coyote And Pine Nut And The Big Fish'

911 Words2 Pages

Group 1, Question B Stone Mother describes the tale of a mother of four children who, in an attempt to disassemble her children’s fighting, separates them. She instructs the siblings to light a fire, one from the north and one from the south. The siblings directed to go to the south ultimately never lit a fire causing the Stone Mother to cry enough tears to form a lake out of worry for her children. The origin story of Stone Mother describes all the criteria mentioned in “Native American Traditions.” For example, Stone Mother ties in ecological aspects with moral characteristics (Stone Mother’s tears that form the lake) and emphasizes the importance of both sibling harmony and mother-child bond (Stone Mother separating her children because …show more content…

For starters, both stories centralize on animals and these animals are somehow related to the creation or “beginning” of something. In “Coyote and Pine Nut,” the story explains the existence of juniper trees in Northern California and pine trees in Nevada (Origin Stories 3: Coyote and Pine Nut). Likewise, “The Big Fish,” story provides an explanation to the abundance of fish in June Lake, Gull Lake, Silver Lake, and Grant Lake (Origin Stories 4: The Big Fish). Both animals are given a huge role to play in the ecological aspect of the land. Conversely, the moods of both stories are starkly different. Whereas the tale of Coyote and Pine Nut is told in a light-hearted and joking manner, the tale of the Big Fish takes on a more serious tone as the narrator explains how the Big Fish stands for unity and familial bond amongst the Northern Paiutes. Perhaps this stems from the fact that the coyote in Native American traditions is a figure associated with tricks and jokes rather than …show more content…

This is further emphasized when he explains that the Native Taino people “were very firmly convinced that [he], with [his] ships and men, came from the heavens” and that “[t]his belief [was] not the result of ignorance, for [the Native Taino people], on the contrary, [are] of a very acute intelligence…” (Columbus). In comparison to Columbus’ manner of speaking, the native Americans accentuate respect and reach out for equality rather than superiority. While Columbus only believed in appealing to his own people, the native Americans in the Alcatraz Proclamation attempt to appease every single party involved. This is shown when they state that “[they would] give the inhabitants… a portion of [the] land…” (Alcatraz Proclamation), pay money that is of greater value in comparison to other purchases of islands, and even “guide the inhabitants in the proper way of living” (Alcatraz Proclamation). The stark difference in how each convey the other comes from the notion of superiority and inferiority. Columbus believed he was of greater status than the Native Taino people, therefore his behavior towards them and his manner of speaking about them was inherently crude and unfiltered since he had no reason to believe that he had to tread on his

Open Document