Nazifa Ahmed Coach Earnest Defense Lawyer Question and Analysis 9 November 2017 Queen Isabella Questions What were your motives for giving a murderer named Alonso de Hojeda a license to kill? This question will further my argument because it introduces information that supports my argument. The question will allow for the Queen to talk about her motives. I expect she will admit to ordering the murders of English men on a expedition to the new world because of Spain's development and stopping the development of other countries. This presents the question “Why wouldn’t the Queen order Columbus to kill and enslave natives if it guaranteed Spain’s success over other countries if they were willing to stop a small English expedition?” The natives …show more content…
The evidence of the papal bulls Inter Caetera and Dadam Siquidem prove that the permission came from the Pope. It's clear that going against the Church is a punishable act in the country and in the eyes of their God. Enslaving and evangelizing them was an honorable act because they were believed to brought to salvation (Rivera). Carol Delaney Questions From Christopher Columbus’s primary sources, what were his impressions of the Natives? This question will further the defense’s argument because the answer will establish the idea that Columbus had a good impression of the Natives. Columbus’s journal talks about how he liked the natives and thought they were intelligent (Nardi). He also thought they would be natural Christians as they had no false faith and he believed they did not have any other Gods (Pelowski). He told his men not to “marud, [or] rape but treat [them] with respect.” This shows that he didn’t want to harm or harass them, he wanted to get along. Liked natives - thought they were intelligent Natural christians - no false faith Told crew not to “marud, rape but treat with …show more content…
Columbus's Ultimate Goal. 1st ed., 2017, https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/columbus.pdf. Kilkenny, Niall. The Columbus Myth Exposed At Last!! Reformation.org, 2007, www.reformation.org/columbus-myth-exposed.html. Myint, B. “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Villain?” Biography.com, A&E Networks Television, 6 Oct. 2017, www.biography.com/news/christopher-columbus-day-facts. Nagy, Joan. Author Carol Delaney To Speak: Columbus And The Quest For Jerusalem. Hartford Courant, 23 Oct. 2012, articles.courant.com/2012-10-23/community/hcrs-66782hc-simsbury-20121016_1_christopher-columbus-jerusalem-quest. Nardi, William. Columbus Is Not a Villain: Professor Says Explorer Has Been Seriously Maligned. Student Free Press Association, 9 Oct. 2017, www.thecollegefix.com/post/37643/. Pelowski, Alton. Why Columbus Sailed. Knights of Columbus, 6 Oct. 2017, www.kofc.org/en/columbia/detail/2012_06_columbus_interview.html. Rivera, Luis N. A Violent Evangelism: the Political and Religious Conquest of the Americas. Westminster/John Knox Press,
Teja, Jesus F. De La. A Revolution Remembered: The Memoirs and Selected Correspondence of Juan N. Seguin. Austin: State House Press, 1991.
Ransby believes “Columbus 's image has been scrubbed clean and sanitized by many generations of American historians so that he can now be offered up as a sterling example of the glorious era of discovery.” (Ransby, 1992/2015, p.14). Objective evidence is also a major component in this article. Columbus’s journal proved he wanted to exploit, and enslave the Indians. A population of 300,000 dwindled to a mere one by 1540. (Ransby, 1992/2015, p.12). Many scene of rape, murder and beating were also described in journals of sailors that travelled with
The discovery and conquest of American Indians inspired efforts to develop an ideology that could justify why they needed to enslave the Indians. The Spanish monarch wanted an ideal empire. "A universal empire, of which all their subjects were but servants. Charles V remained for them the dominus mundi, the legitimate and God-ordained lord of the world." (Weckmann, The Transit of Civilization, 23) Gold and religious conversion was the two most important inspirations for conquistadors in conquering America. Father Bartolome De Las Casas was a Dominican priest who came to the New World to convert the Indians to become Christians. He spent forty years on Hispanolia and nearby islands, and saw how the Spaniards brutally treated the Indians and sympathized with them. The Devastation of the Indies was an actual eyewitness account of the genocide by Las Casas, and his group of Dominican friars in which he demonizes the Spanish colonists and praises the Indians. Father Las Casas returned to Seville, where he published his book that caused an on going debate on whether the suppression of the Indians corrupted the Spaniards' values. What Las Casas was trying to achieve was the notion of human rights, that human beings are free and cogent by nature without the interference of others.
What he and his men did to the Indigenous people is told in horrifying detail by the Dominican priest Bartolome de Las Casas, “whose writings give the most thorough account of the Spanish-Indian encounter.” Las Casas witnessed firsthand Columbus’ soldiers stabbing Natives for sport, dashing babies’ heads on rocks, and sexually abusing Indigenous women. His testimony was corroborated by other eyewitnesses, such as a group of Dominican friars, who addressed the Spanish monarchy in 1519, hoping to bring an end to the atrocities. At the very least, Columbus was complicit in the actions of his men. He cared so little for the welfare of the Indigenous people that he let his soldiers commit reprehensible acts that would be considered crimes against humanity in the present day. Christopher Columbus’ actions suggest he had no issue with serving as an enabler of the horrifying actions committed by his men against the Indigenous
First, Columbus was a cruel man who enslaved, raped, and murdered the natives of the countries he sailed to. According to an article by John Margolis entitled "Goodbye Columbus", Columbus "oversaw the killings of some (Indians) and ordered the enslavement of others." Margolis goes on to say that Columbus did not prevent his crewmen from raping the innocent natives, and even that he himself raped an Indian women after beating her "with a piece of rope". If these actions do not constitute villainy, I don't know what does.
Columbus enslaved the Native Americans in two ways. The first was “[enslaving] them to work in his brutal gold mines. Within only two years, 125,000 (half of the population) of the original natives on the island were dead” (Kasum). The other type of enslavement was “the selling of native girls into sexual slavery. Young girls of the ages 9 to 10 were the most desired by his men” (Kasum). If slavery was not bad enough, “In the early years of Columbus’ conquests there were butcher shops throughout the Caribbean where Indian bodies were sold as dog food. There was also a practice known as the montería infernal, the infernal chase, or manhunt, in which Indians were hunted by war-dogs” (Schilling). There is absolutely no way any person could be considered a hero after seizing, enslaving, and causing the deaths of hundreds of people, especially if these people were so innocent and friendly. Even “Bartolome De Las Casas, a former slave owner who became Bishop of Chiapas, described these exploits. ‘Such inhumanities and barbarisms were committed in my sight as no age can parallel,’ he wrote. ‘My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature that now I tremble as I write’” (Schilling) Columbus must be a villain in our own
After examining the writings of Christopher Columbus and Bartolome de Las Casas, it is clear to see that there is a stark contrast between their description of the Spanish settlers. In the excerpt from the Christopher Columbus Journal, 1492, Columbus seems to depict the Spanish as righteous, entitled saviors who have come to help the Indians. An example of this can be found on page four, where Columbus writes, “…Your Highnesses will see from seven that I caused to be taken in order to carry them away to you and to learn our language and to return them. Except that, whenever your Highnesses may command, all of them can be taken to Castile or held captive in this same island.” This quote demonstrates how the Spanish believed they could do whatever
Written sometime after A People’s History of the United States, the play on words might indicate the authors’ intent to refute the biased nature of the older book, and redeem the major players. Chapter one begins covering the year 1492-1707 with the age of European discovery. Schweikart and Allen focus of the catchy phrase “God, glory, and gold” as the central motives for exploration, emphasizing the desire to bring the Gospel to the New World. They paint native settlers as “thieves” and “bloodthirsty killers who pillage for pleasure” (Allen 1). The narrative continues, discussing the explorers from Portugal and Spain and their contact with the Arabs and Africans. The authors quote Columbus as saying “[he] hoped to convert them ‘to our Holy Faith by love rather than by force’” (4) a contrary portrayal to that in A People’s History of the United States. The authors continue on to discuss the French and English and the foundations for success in the New World; how people lived in the Colonial South. They write about the physical labor, the natural resources, and the food. Schweikart and Allen enlighten the readers about early slavery, the start of the House of Burgesses, the founding of Plymouth, Massachusetts, the Pequot Indian War, the English Civil War, Bacon’s Rebellion, Pennsylvania’s settlement, and the
The process of committing a violent act is psychological in and of itself, to be able to physically hurt someone you must believe they are less then you. What must you believe to commit murder, much less mass murder or genocide? In an impressive display of cognitive dissonance Columbus went from admiring the Native American using words and phrases such as “well built”, “of quick intelligence”. When justifying going to war he calls them “cruel”, “warlike and numerous”, and “stupid”. Columbus justified the enslavement and murder of the Native people by dehumanizing them, making them less than human. Even when Columbus is complimenting the Caribbean Natives he is already thinking
Christopher Columbus acted as a *vocab friend to the Native Americans when he really just enslaved and killed them; that sparking the start of a genocide. Columbus and the rest of the Europeans stumbling upon the Americas in 1492 was just a start of the events the caused this holocaust, also known as the 500 year war, and the longest holocaust in history. Young Americans today are taught that the Native Americans and European colonist were *vocab friendly, while ?he enslaved and caused much harm to the culture, including nearly killing it off (Stannard). Public Schools teach students that Christopher Columbus did a good thing and find our land, just like Hitler used propaganda to brainwash naive citizens into thinking what he did was a respectable
Columbus described the people as being timid and unfitted to use weapons. He wrote, “They have no iron or steel or weapons, nor are they fitted to use them. This is not because they are not very well built and of handsome stature, but because they are very marvellously timorous.” Columbus described them as though they will not provide any resistance because they do not have the skill to use weapons, and that they very timid people. However, as shown in the first quote, Columbus wrote that they did not put up any opposition; he later wrote in the letter that he took some of the natives by force. If the natives did not put up any opposition to Columbus, why would he need to take them by force? Columbus also notes that they had been very serviceable, and would very much be open to evangelization. An important note, Columbus wrote more and provided more detail about the vast islands he had “discovered” compared to the indigenous people, of which he wrote, “ In all these islands, I saw no great diversity in the appearance of the people or in their manners and language.” In the end, Columbus’s description of the Indigenous people was that are serviceable people would make adequate slaves. Columbus’s letter paints a good picture into his imperialistic mind, as opposed to providing information about the
Although this essay is historically accurate it lacks important details, which might paint a different view of Columbus. Boorstin writes favorable of Columbus and depicts him as a heroic and determined figure who helped shape history, but he neglects to include Columbus’ unethical acts committed in the world that was not supposed to exist, the Americas. When Columbus first discovered the New World, he took care that the royal standard had been brought ashore and he claimed the land for Spain in front of all, including the indigenous population who had been sighted even before Columbus made landfall. According to the medieval concepts of natural law, only those territories that are uninhabited can become the property of the first person to discover them. Clearly this was an unethical act. Thus, the first contact between European and non-European worlds was carried out through a decidedly European prism, which ensured Spanish claim to the islands of the Americas. Faced with a colony in an inhospitable area, the Spanish soon inaugurated the practice of sending regular military parties inland to subdue the increasingly hostile natives. Members of the indigenous population were captured and enslaved to support the fledgling colony. The object of Columbus’ desire changed from exploration and trade to conquest and subjugation.
This is an analysis of Christopher Columbus’s Letter on His First Voyage on page 381. Christopher Columbus wrote a letter to his King and Queen of Spain, while he was in the West Indies. He wrote this letter in February 1493 reflecting on his voyage across the Atlantic in 1492. After reading this letter, I can tell that Columbus felt like he was better than the native people of the different islands he journeyed and that a lot of things they did were very strange to him. I can also tell that the world was a lot different to him and to people in 1492, than it is to people in 2014 because he referred to the native people of the various islands he traveled to as Indians, whereas most people in 2014 know that India and Latin American are not the
When Columbus landed on the new land he put a flag in the ground claiming it for Spain. Then he met the Native Americans and was very friendly to them. “I want the natives to develop a friendly attitude toward us because I know that they are a people who can be made free and converted to our Holy Faith more by love thwn by force,” Columbus wrote in his journal.
The first Catholic priests came to South America with the conquistadors and through social and political force superimposed 16th century Catholicism upon conquered peoples and in subsequent generations upon slaves arriving in the New World. Catholicism has, likewise, frequently absorbed, rather than confronted, popular folk religious beliefs. The resulting religion is often overtly Catholic but covertly pagan. Behind the Catholic facade, the foundations and building structure reflect varying folk religious traditions. (2)