With the new Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) offered to the Hudson High School, both breakfast and lunch have become free. Due to this offer students at the Hudson High School eat lunch because it is free, however they do not like it and discard twenty five percent of it. I established a survey to send out to the students at Hudson High and was amazed at the reponses. However the results were not surprising. Students at the Hudson High School have lunch in light of the fact that it is free, on the other hand they don't care for it and throw it away. Upon walking to lunch one sees the huge lines for lunch that were not there last year. Last year some students had to pay for lunch, which they believed was not worth it. Now that lunch …show more content…
I was not shocked at the results but after seeing the numbers I became aware of the issue at hand. Of the one hundred five responses 42.9% eat lunch at school everyday, while 17.1 % never eat school lunch, and the rest eat it four, three, or two times a week. The data suggest that most people rely on school lunches to fill them up. Some of the reasons that 17.1 % do not eat school lunch can be due to distaste of school lunch, or the less quantity. Of the 42.9% of people that get school lunch 34 said it tastes bad and 10 said it taste very bad. 40% of the people said that they get school lunch because they are hungry. The data suggest that due to feeling hungry students still eat the food even though they dislike the taste. Because of the new health policies installed by CEP the calories of lunch is decreased resulting in small proportions, I was interested in what students had to say. Of the students that eat school lunch due to hunger, 23 believe that the food proportion is not enough for them. Of the 21.9% that said they eat lunch because they have no other choice 19 said the amount of food is not enough. Some generalization we can make is that enough food is not offered to students at Hudson High, they feel hungry and may have to stay after school and can not afford to buy snacks. I was interested in asking people if they threw food away and was surprised at the results. 71 students said that they do
The shocking truth about our school lunches is that they are not health for young kids. The meat most schools use K.F.C and Campbell soup refuse to buy such meat. This shows that school lunch is not very health for kids if fast food won’t even use it. Schools are also
Janet Poppendieck is a professor of sociology at Hunter College in New York, and additionally she is the author of several books including her most recent Free for All: Fixing School Food in America. This book centers on America’s recent interest in whether or not our school lunches are healthy. This issue has been put into the spotlight recently through shows such as Jamie Oliver’s School Food Revolution and in the news because recent changes in the Nation School Lunch Program’s dietary guidelines. Poppendieck’s book looks at the in depth reasons into why school lunches have turned into what they are today, what challenges need to be faced in order to fix school lunches, and ultimately how our the system should be fixed. She accomplishes this by interviewing her current college students about their previous school lunch experiences, working in a school cafeteria, interviewing current school employees, and looking at the history and policies of the National School Lunch Program.
has to spend more money on changing school lunch system from eliminating unnecessary spending portion of system and create farming class. As reported by Cooper, “ The National School Lunch Program needs 8 billion dollars to feed 30 million children a year to serve high quality foods.” However, this price of amount has to be double to serve healthy foods to students because our next generation has to grow up with high quality foods not with low quality foods. Moreover, according to Cooper, the U.S. spends more than 100 million dollars on fast foods portion which the U.S. suppose to spend less amount of money on fast foods to improve the entire food system of the country. If the U.S. government lower the expense of fast food system and raises the amount of money for school lunches, entire schools of the U.S. would get positive results. For example, students could brainstorm very fast as Albert Einstein, and gain more energy to work out on their gym classes. Furthermore, school have to create agriculture class for students to have strong knowledges in foods. Students can literally be ware of what they eat at their lunch times; they will know vegetables grow in the ground and how foods are really fresh. Therefore, schools must provide farming class as in Berkeley; students have rights to know how foods are important to them. As a result, students could get a lot of benefits for changing school
Government date shows that in the past thirty years, rate of being overweight in six to eleven year olds is up 19% and 6% in age 12 to 19. Without support, school lunches remain high in fat. (Finkelstien) According to the CDCP, obesity is double what it was in children and triple in adolescents since 1980. Many reforms were attempted to help this problem, but many inadvertently caused more problems. (Finkelstien) A 730 calorie lunch should have no more than 24 grams of fat and no more than 8 grams of it saturated yet the average USDA lunch has 31 grams of fat and 14 rams of it is saturated. (Yeoman) These very high levels of fat are why obesity is becoming worse in children. It can be concluded that school food is still extremely high in fat and this can be directly linked to the high rates of obesity in young children and
“Our Schools need to start teaching kids how to be healthy.”- Unknown. School lunches have created a chronic problem in a school setting, and since it hasn't been fixed, 6-11 year olds have had a 17% increased chance of becoming obese (Centers for Disease control and Prevention). Most school districts don't even bother changing the food restrictions just so they can please their students. Unhealthy school lunches are a huge problem among children in the United States, it can cause obesity, stress, and many other problems.
“More than 76 percent of schools sell soft drinks and sweetened fruit drinks, but fewer than half offered bottles water. Fewer than 15 percent sell low-fat or nonfat yogurt, and fewer than one third order skim milk. Only 25 percent of schools say they've reduced fats and oils in recipes.”(Spake, 2). Choices at lunch range from greasy to unidentifiable. Most students eat school lunches five days a week. So most of the food they eat throughout the week comes from the school cafeteria. Although, the schools do tend to offer healthy choices such as salads, subs, skim milk, and unlimited fruits and vegetables. “Each week Phoenix students are served a variety of fruits and vegetables from guava to grapes and jicima to red peppers. School officials hope that by exposing children to fruits and vegetable they may develop a taste for them and request their parents to buy them.”(Bailey, 1). Real meat is becoming an issue in schools. “According to reports issued by the Physicians Committee for responsible Medicine (PCRM) the USDA dumps hundreds of millions of pounds of surplus beef, chicken, cheese, and pork on the National School lunch Program.”(Lord, 42). Chicken isn't whole white meat; some of it doesn't even taste like meat! Let’s move on to unhealthy foods. There are unlimited amounts of un...
Fruits and vegetables are now considered two separate groups, with increased servings. Since Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act went into effect School districts have been struggled to executing the program, the backlash from students was almost immediate children began throwing away most of their lunch.”The School Nutrition Association said that 70 percent of school meal programs had taken a significant financial hit since the new mandates went into effect. Cafeteria operators from Los Angeles to New York report discouraging amounts of food waste and declining
More than 30 million children trundle through school cafeteria lines and 24% of children leave their food untouched. If 24% of students leave their food untouched, this is a waste of perfectly good food. They leave their food untouched because they just don’t like the food that they are given, but they are forced to get it because they have no other choice other than that specific type of food. If students could choose the type of food that they want by leaving campus and going to their favorite restaurant, it could benefit students tremendously. Although having an open campus at lunch may lead to skipping school or other delinquent activities, high schools should have an open campus because it benefits students by it giving students a way
“Schools become the ‘last frontier’ for hungry kids.” usatoday.com). Thus, many students do not carry the proper balance of nutrition through school that conceals the students indoors through the school day. Students are in a constant battle for motivation in the classroom atmosphere that does not consider a student’s pace while learning. Today, students in community schools from Michigan seldom use open campus privileges. (Johnson, Adrian. “Should high schools have open campus for lunch?” www.mlive.com). Students’ are required to stay on campus to abstain from the increase of truancy leading to missing instructional
Lunch is one of the most important meals that nobody should skip. This meal re-energizes your body and fuels you up. Throughout the United States millions of students eat their lunch at school everyday. Besides eating , lunch serves as a break from the routine of attending classes for students. Modern schools have accepted the idea of an open campus lunch whereas some schools have not. Freedom and responsibility play a huge role in the lives of high school students. Concerning this subject , students should not have that privilege because it opens an area of danger such as car accidents, tardiness.
As discussed throughout this paper there has been controversy about Michelle Obama’s school lunch guidelines. The reader has heard multiple arguments developed from this topic from each viewpoint expressed in this dispute. Now it is up to them to take a side.This paper is about Michelle Obama’s school lunch guidelines and how they are affecting schools and students across the nation. To help reduce the number of overweight children in America, Michelle Obama made lunch regulations schools had to follow and sparked a widespread conflict.
With the implementation of the “Healthy Kids Hunger-Free Act” schools are not serving as many lunches and participation is decreasing. According to the Government Accountability Office (GOA), “Nationwide, student participation declined by 1.2 million students(or 3.7 percent) from school year 2010-2011 through school year 2012-2013, after having increased steadily for many years”(sec. 1). The school lunches became more distasteful and bland; the combinations of foods did not make sense, and the portion sizes decreased significantly. In order to support the cafeteria
One reason our school should get a new lunch menu is many students do not like the food served. For example, a survey was taken and of the 31 students 100% said they disliked the food. As student Bryan Huang said, “The lunches are horrible, they need better choices and more choices.” In other words, the food is not delicious and there are not many choices. Also, when children don’t get proper nutrition they have trouble focusing in school. Most students do not buy lunch because they feel it is unappealing and do not like the food served. Many students go to other kids and ask for food. In addition, many students do not eat breakfast so they rely on lunch to fuel them for the day. But, if they do not like the food served they won’t eat so they starve for the rest of the school day, which can
After such a large number of years of eating in school cafeterias, they ought to have the capacity to appreciate their last year of secondary school with this open door. Additionally since large portions of the instructors or staff would not eat in the cafeteria because of long lines, the absence of time to eat and not the best nourishment seniors ought not either. Seniors are the youthful grown-ups of our future and its time they got a chance to demonstrate it. On the off chance that they would prefer not to eat nourishment that has been decided for them they ought to have the capacity to go somewhere else and get what they might want to eat. " In the event that these understudies can vote and enroll in the armed force to go to war, it's only senseless to talk about regardless of whether they can go out to lunch" expressed Chris Roger who is a board part at Roxbury High School furthermore bolsters their off grounds lunch program (Simone 2012).
People who work for long, unusual hours could have minimal opportunity to make their own food, and thus turn to a bag of chips or a Big Mac for nourishment. People with large families or small children depend on faster ways to get food. Even students who don’t have the time or money to take packed lunches to school will depend on food provided at school. School lunches are available at subsidized prices, however, the nutritional value is weak. First Lady Michelle Obama made it her mission to encourage the creation of healthier school lunches.