Reading Response To William Gibson's Neuromancer

543 Words2 Pages

Reading Response 3
In the beginning of Neuromancer, William Gibson effectively entices the reader with details to further the plot, but not enough to fully comprehend the story on its own. By the end of chapter 1, Gibson mentions a handful of locations, characters, and concepts that influence the reader to create his/her own version of Neuromancer. Along with that, he also packs a lot of information in small passages. For example, by analyzing the fifth paragraph of chapter one, beauty is showcased, technological advances are compared to the time period, and Gibson’s use of repetition and sarcasm revealed more about Case’s character.
Gibson begins the passage by commenting on Ratz, the bartender’s, smile and emphasizes its gross appearance. He refers to Ratz’s ugliness as “stuff of legend” which signifies that his appearance was unique (Gibson 4). In the preceding sentence Gibson mentions, “In an age of affordable beauty, there was something heraldic about his lack of it,” which brings up two key concepts (4). First, the term “age of affordable beauty” alerts the reader that the society in Neuromancer care about their appearances and will take cosmetic measures to follow this beauty standard, since it was cheap and common. Second, the other half …show more content…

Gibson mentions Ratz’s arm is a prosthetic limb and uses descriptions such as “military-quality,” “seven-function force-feedback,” and “encased in plastic” to highlight how technologically advanced it was compared to the reader’s time (4). Gibson further emphasizes on this point by adding one more detail to the prosthetic limb by saying it was “antique,” which raises a question in the reader’s head (4). If this prosthetic limb is an antique model in Neuromancer, then what additional advancements could a “modern” limb have? This question can only be answered by the reader’s imagination and his/her belief on newer

Open Document