Psychodynamic Approach Analysis

649 Words2 Pages

Applied Theory Critique #1: Psychoanalytic Approach I’ve learned about Freud and his eccentric theories countless times throughout my undergraduate career, which led me to be unenthusiastic about the Psychoanalytic Approach at first. I was astonished to realize that I enjoyed the lecture more than I expected to. I don’t agree with many of his ideas, and gravitate towards more contemporary theories. Nonetheless, I have respect and openness towards Freud because I understand how essential his ideas were to shape the field of counseling. The main components of Freud’s theory that I liked and agreed with were many concepts of the Dynamic Approach. Psychic determinism helps counselors understand clients more because it can show the reasoning behind many of their actions, behaviors, and motives. Also, it allows counselors to be curious and on their feet because they should wonder if there is a deeper meaning to the client’s verbal and non-verbal communication. Also, I liked that Freud focused on the individual's past because there are many conflicts in life that we never confront. After these conflicts are brought into awareness and we understand our behavior, acceptance is possible. However, I …show more content…

I disagreed with Freud when he said people repress memories because they are too traumatizing to handle. I believe people choose not to think of traumatic events, but are more willing to open up in a trusting environment. Also, it is dangerous to get someone to “remember” an event that they say did not happen, because it could result in false memories. Another aspect of Freud’s work that makes me hesitant is how he usually blamed the mother. As a future counselor, I think his approach analyzes and blames others too easily. Counseling should pay attention to past events, but focus on the individual’s strengths and

Open Document