Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inequality in legal systems
Class inequality within the legal system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Inequality in legal systems
How does power contribute to the construction of law, both on the books and in action?
Power, the ability to influence others and the course of events, affects laws and
shapes cultural beliefs in society. In our society, power is said to be equally distributed
throughout the people, and there is a democratic belief that collective action is able to
create change. However, collective power is heavily influenced by the wealthy. Those
with power have the resources to influence the creation and termination of law, both on
the books and in action. Power, ultimately controlled by the wealthy and elite, shapes the
construction of laws to benefit them and their values, in order to maintain the dichotomy
between themselves and the less powerful.
While some of the more obvious, tangible foundations of power include money,
capital and property, Galanter discusses additional aspects of power in its definition and
its benefits. Galanter explains the differences between the “haves”, or the repeat players,
and the “have-nots”, or the one-shotters. In this analogy, the former is equivalent to the
powerful, and the latter to the powerless. The repeat players, according to Galanter, have
the advantage because they know the rules, have previous experience, have both legal
and financial resources, and have much less to lose than the one-shotters. All of these
assets together demonstrate the “superior opportunities” (Galanter 82) of the powerful
repeat players over the powerless. Galanter explains, “To the extent that rules are
evenhanded or favor the ‘have-nots’, the limited resources for their implementation will
be allocated, I have argued, so as to give greater effect to those rules which protect and
promote the tangible inte...
... middle of paper ...
...John J. Bonsignore, Ethan Katsh, D'errico
Peter, Ronald M. Pipkin, Stephen Arons, and Janet Rifkin. Ed. Katherine
Meisenheimer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006. 81-89.
Hilbink, Thomas. “Who makes the law? The people? Which people?” Legal Studies 250:
Introduction to Legal Studies. Herter Hall, Amherst. 6 Feb. 2007.
Hilbink, Thomas. “Who makes the law? To what extent is law shaped by those in
power?” Legal Studies 250: Introduction to Legal Studies. Herter Hall, Amherst.
8 Feb. 2007.
MacKinnon, Catherine. “A Rally against Rape.” Introduction to Legal Studies. Ed.
Thomas Hilbink. 2007. 81-84.
"Proposition 215: the Compassionate Use Act of 1996." Before the Law. Comp. John J.
Bonsignore, Ethan Katsh, D'errico Peter, Ronald M. Pipkin, Stephen Arons, and
Janet Rifkin. Ed. Katherine Meisenheimer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company,
2006. 172-173.
Power is a great privilege to have and a person can take advantage of the power if they have it. Getting the privilege of power can be abused and misused depending on the person it is given to. Sometimes if the power lands in the wrong person’s hands they can use it to benefit themselves. In the novel called Montana 1948 by Larry Watson, the power of the law is being abused in the situations occurring throughout the book. Having power and privileges can make a great impact on your life and other people’s lives and give you a variety of advantages.
The power held by individuals and companies plays a heavy role in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Power is held and exerted by those with financial, political, or physical superiority. All characters in the book are in some way affected by power, whether directly or indirectly. Without the absences of power of some individuals, especially Henrietta Lacks, the events in the book would have never transpired.
the laws it chooses, 2. the rule of law, which says that laws must be
On the surface, it seems that determining how much power courts have would be a simple task. However, history has proven this to be false. The courts have been viewed in many different ways through out the history of our country. There are three common views of court power that are important for modern scholars of the court system. Those who believe courts have little power to cause social change are said to adhere to the Constrained Court view. Those who believe courts have a great deal of power to cause social change are said to adhere to the Dynamic Court view. The final, and youngest, take on court power combines aspects of the Constrained and Dynamic views into what I shall call the Condition Dependent Court view of power. This view sees that there are certain conditions which allow the court to cause social change.
...form of power. The subject that is currently in control is not in control for the long run. There are other opposing forces that will eventually come along to overthrow subjects in power. If the world stayed the same and power never shifted then we as a human race would be destined for failure. Thankfully that hasn’t happened yet, but we can look in our school’s history textbooks and find plenty of situations where certain regimes didn’t hold out and were annihilated by others. This is a natural cycle of the universe that prevents too much power from existing. It’s important for individuals living today to be able to recognize the power within them and the power that’s morally and rightfully accessible to them. Moreover, it’s important for people to understand the boundaries and limits of today’s society and that a relationship with power is fragile; don’t abuse it.
have power are imposing their will on those with less power. The fact that at some point in the
their power to reinforce their dominant position and impede the ability of powerless groups to
To begin with, power presented in Mosca and Weber can be generally defined as an ability possessed by a person or group of people to influence others. In addition, putting aside definitions of power defined by previous authors such as Hobbes and Blau, power can be described as the ability to possess and preserve a value or tradition represented at the time. Expanding on this idea, individual and collective power, that is, power in the hand...
Power is a quality, a tool, and a weapon utilized for a variety of reasons. It is in the form of a quality in which it gives the possessor, a sense of control. In the form of a weapon, power is possessed in order to produce a negative environment of hurt and punishment. But, in the form of a tool, power may be used in order to gain something more, something positive. Thus, power creates a sense of superiority which may result in consequences on both side of the spectrum, the good or the bad.
Within a society power serves a vital role of establishing and maintaining roles of dominance and submission (Bourdieu, 1977). This creates and maintains a social hierarchy of inequality that unconsciously determines the status, behavioural expectations and available resources for members of the community (Navarro, 2006). The meaning of power within a society is that it determines one’s social standing or relational position within the given community as well as the level of dominance or power they have available to exert onto others. Power, within a society is primarily created through the habitus, capital and culture of a
Power is the physical and mental control someone or something has over another person or a group of people. I am afraid that if I plagiarize on my essay, I might be penalized or suspended. That is the power of fear. Power has the ability to impact the behavior of people. Contrary to what people believe, power does not necessarily involve the use of force, or threats. As important as analyzing power is, there is no way to really comprehend power. Power is too diverse and controversial. Power in our society is very unstable, causing gender inequality, racism and numerous other social problems. Let us take for example, gender inequality. We cannot explain gender inequality if we do not understand power first. Power does not result in gender inequality or racism, it builds them. Thinking about or fixing power imbalances will solve a lot of problems in the social world, and for that sole reason, it is worth thinking about power to understand society.
The existence of power in all of its forms has ruled earthly nature for as long as time. Taking this into account, the forces that have governed even the simplest of interactions, such as the alpha system of a wolf pack, or the superior covalent bonds seen in water molecules that require an excessive amount of energy to be broken, reveal that there is a plethora of instances where power is capable of determining the state of interactions within life and the fundamental laws of physical elements. Inevitably, the ideals of power managed to seep into the minds of humans, dominating its presence in practically every aspect of human values and culture, and shaping the organization
laws made by others in our society, and decide whether or not the laws we make
and the theories of Petrazycki, Ehrlich and Habermas prescribes law as an important mean in the structuring of society.