Parthenon Vs. Pantheon

972 Words2 Pages

Parthenon vs. Pantheon

In this essay, I will compare and contrast two buildings of different time periods and cultures.
The first building is The Pantheon, built in 118–128 CE. It is placed in Rome, Italy. The building was completed by the roman emperor Publius Aelius Hadrianus (Pantheon, n.d.).
The second building is The Parthenon, built in 432 BCE. It is placed in Athens, Greece on the Acropolis,which is a citadel above the city. The building was constructed by the architects Iktinos and Kallikrates (Parthenon, n.d.).

The Pantheon that now exists is the third version that was build on this approximate spot, as the two preceding Pantheons were destroyed.

It was built with the revolutionary arch-technology where the
“arch directs pressure …show more content…

The Parthenon and the Pantheon have many similarities. They were both originally designed as temples, use 8 columns to support their front pediment and are based on the greek architecture with great regard and love for symmetry and geometry. Both buildings have survived for thousands of years, still more or less well preserved and are legacies of an ancient world with ingenious architects and artists, who still inspire us today.

The differences between the Parthenon and the Pantheon are numerous. The Parthenon is square and completely made out of marble in the doric style and was a temple for only the goddess Athena. The Pantheon, on the other hand, has a dome-shaped roman style architecture and is made out of concrete and bricks. Its columns are corinthian style and all the gods and deified emperors were worshiped in the temple.

Both the Parthenon and the Pantheon are great examples of the different art and architecture styles. In their lifetime they have both undergone changes and their history is written on the weathered walls and spread through the world by inspiring architects to copy them even

More about Parthenon Vs. Pantheon

Open Document