Panopticism an Essay Written by Michel Foucault

1195 Words3 Pages

Subjectivity can be found in almost every aspect of society; past, present, and future. In other words, whether it’s between a ruler and his empire, a government and its citizens, or even students being subject to the rules of a school, people have always been in a condition of being subject. In this position they are the ones who lack the power and the control, whereas those who they are subject to— have the power and control. Because of this, the subject might act accordingly to whomever or whatever they are subject to.
In Michel Foucault‘s essay, Panopticism, he argues that the structure of the Panopticon is similar to the power structure of our society and ultimately, it falls under the concept of subjectivity. The Panopticon is a prison design that is made up of a large room, surrounded by cells for prisoners. There is a tower in the center that allows a guard to watch the prisoners and keep order over them. However, the most important thing about this is that the guard is not visible to the prisoners from the outside. Foucault states that it creates the allusion that the prisoners are always being watched. By letting the prisoners know they’re being watched but not when they’re being watched gives the watchers ultimate power over the prisoner. Because of this, the prisoners behave and follow the rules to avoid being punished by the guard. The guard doesn’t even need to be present for the allusion to work. Another example of the effect is the cameras at a store. People know cameras are present, generally stopping people from stealing because they know they’re being watched. Overall, the Panopticon has created Panopticism; the theory that when someone is being watched, they have the freedom to do whatever, but act a certain ...

... middle of paper ...

...ociety constructs Sojourner Truth into being what she doesn’t think she deserves to be. She is a woman and wishes to be treated equally as one. However, she is simply subject and watched by the Panopticon of a corrupt society.
In his chapter on Panopticism, Michael Foucault states, “the Panopticon is a marvelous machine in which, whatever use one may wish to put it to, produces homogeneous effects of power.” He would say that despite how corrupt the use of the panopticism was in 1851, it surely and painfully existed. In the essay he stated that the Panopticon has no risk, therefore, that the increase of power created by the panoptic machine may degenerate into tyranny. This is similar to Sojourner Truth’s case, where the society particularly in the south saw blacks and women as inferior. This use of panopticism placed an entire race and gender under subjectivity.

Open Document