Olympics: Symbolism And Consequences Of The 1936 Summer Olympics

1549 Words4 Pages

Perhaps one of the most controversial Olympic Games, the 1936 Berlin Summer Olympics were riddled with anti-semitism and racial discrimination, mixed with Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in Germany, resulted in boycotts from many nations. Hitler’s Olympics by Christopher Hilton illustrates key events from years before the Olympics to decades after. The three most prominent topics discussed were why Hitler wanted the Games, the debate on whether the United States should go to the Games, and the Games themselves. The book itself was very intriguing. The text was clear and convincing, and points were clearly stated and supported by primary sources. After five years of preparation, the 1936 Summer Olympics will always be commemorated.
Compelling in
In preparation, Helene Mayer, a fencer who won the European Championships, “illustrated one theme perfectly: the self-contained, non-political world of sport. Adolf Hitler, who concentrated on winning Germany, was the other: politics red in tooth and claw” (8). People had different views when it came to the purpose of the Games. Most believed that the Olympics were all about the celebration of sports and athletes coming together to be the best in the world. Hitler, on the contrary, used the Games to promote his propaganda and the rising power of the Nazis. At first, he had shown little interest in the Olympics. After attaining what he could accomplish by hosting the Games, Adolf Hitler did everything in his power to create the best, most innovative Olympics in history. His efforts were shown through the details of the buildings and arenas, and how specific he designed each one. “Hitler provided the broad sweep, kept an eye on the detail and the whole project went on to something resembling a war footing. Its scope, character and extent were the same as waging a war” (18). Being so determined to construct a stadium that lasts a lifetime, Hitler had become determined to make Berlin the place everyone wanted to go. His plans succeeded in some ways, as “the Olympics provided beautiful international camouflage, because they seemed to show that Germany
Americans, “watched with mounting misgivings. The Jewish community in America had voice and influence. Would America send a team to a country which legally discriminated against Jews in the crudest, bluntest and most violent way” (14)? American racial inequality was real, but also unlike the anti-semitism in Germany. The American Olympic Committee was reluctant to send the team to Berlin as they were unsure of whether their team would be comfortable and if every person would have the same terms and be treated fairly. Avery Brundage, the fifth president of the International Olympic Committee, however, “had heard nothing of discrimination in Germany and there were no ‘reports whatsoever, official or otherwise, that Germany had failed to give Jewish athletes a fair opportunity’. As long as Germany adhered to its promises, the American Olympic Committee had no right to ‘interfere in its internal political, religious, or racial affairs’” (30-31). The decision around American participation in the Games depended on Germany giving every person on each team a fair opportunity. In the end, Jeremiah Mahoney, president of the Amateur Athletic Union, and many American newspaper editors and anti-Nazi groups were unwilling to accept Germany’s pledges regarding German Jewish athletes. Avery Brundage, determined to send an American team to

More about Olympics: Symbolism And Consequences Of The 1936 Summer Olympics

Open Document