Oj Simpson Research Paper

500 Words1 Page

Evidence Collection and Simpson Trial O.J. Simpson an actor and Hall of Fame running back was on trial from November 2nd 1994, until January 24th 1995. Simpson was being tried on two counts of 1st degree murder. The victims of the case were Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ronald Lyle Goldman. The one victim was O.J.’s ex-wife and her friend was the other victim. The crime was carried out, outside Nicole’s home in Los Angeles. The victims were stabbed to death. The trial also took place in Los Angeles. The general public found much controversy and much racial tension whole following the trial The investigation was careless. Two witnesses were inadmissible after they sold their encounters to the press. Evidence was haphazardly collected, and logged. The victim’s body was contaminated by a blanket from her home, after it was used to cover the body. A finger print gathered from the scene was misplaced. Items were bagged incorrectly. Some evidence was bagged together, and other evidence was bagged before drying. Blood was incorrectly logged, and could not be accounted for. “The person who drew the blood could only guess he had taken 8ml; only 6 could be accounted for by the LAPD” (Crime Library, Securing the Evidence). This evidence became inadmissible into the trail. The murder weapon was never found, adding to the prosecution’s difficulty to prove …show more content…

Evidence was explained too scientifically and did was not comprehended by the jury. Some evidenced lacked measurements in photos. The defense questioned the individualization of items. The defense said the shoes, matching the bloody footprints, were massed produced and could the footprints could not be individualized to Simpson’s shoe. Another item questioned is exemplified from John Cochran’s famous line “If the glove doesn’t fit you must acquit.” The defendant’s lawyer insists that the glove cannot be individualized to O.J. Simpson, due to the fact that it doesn’t

Open Document