Oedipus Rex Research Paper

516 Words2 Pages

Aristotle, an acclaimed Ancient Greek philosopher and scientist, once defined a tragic hero as, ‘A virtuous man whose misfortune is brought about not by depravity, but by some error or frailty.’ The essence of a tragic hero is exemplified in the character of the Theban King, Oedipus, in the play Oedipus Rex, written by playwright Sophocles. This Greek tragedy chronicles the day in which, King Oedipus, the seemingly virtuous ruler of Thebes, declares that he will save his beloved city from famine and plague, yet again, by bringing justice to whoever held responsibility for the murder of the previous King of Thebes, Laius. As the day progresses and additional information comes to light, it is discovered that not only was Oedipus responsible for the murder of King Laius, …show more content…

According to Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero, the hero in question must possess hamartia, peripeteia, anagnorisis, hubris, as well a fate that is harsher or more extreme than what seems objectively necessary. In Oedipus Rex, Oedipus’s hamartia, or fatal flaw which leads to his ruin, is a combination of his thirst for knowledge as well as his determination to seek justice, no matter what the cost. Oedipus is desperate to find out who truly murdered King Laius, not only to end his people’s suffering but also for himself, and it is this impulsive desperation to seek the truth of his own identity and save his people which ultimately results in his undoing. In addition, in order to fit the embodiment of a tragic Aristotelian hero, Oedipus must go through peripeteia, or change from good fortune to bad, which occurs when a messenger arrives from Corinth, revealing that Polybus is not Oedipus’s true father. Before the messenger arrived, Oedipus lived in ignorance, under false pretenses that his parents were Polybus and Merope of Corinth, when in fact they were Laius and Jocasta of

Open Document