Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impact of nuclear energy
Nuclear energy negative effects
Nuclear energy negative effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impact of nuclear energy
Nuclear power, although relatively new, is one of the most productive major sources of energy. It has been readily embraced by France, Russia, the United States,and initially Japan, four of the world’s leading nations. Of course, as with every energy source, there are some drawbacks, the bulk of which have to do with safety concerns. For this reason, this particular source faces enormous opposition. Yet, the negatives are so heavily outweighed by the positives (i.e. high economic efficiency and low environmental impact), that they do not in any way draw from the fact that nuclear energy should definitely continue to be used, and more so. Nuclear power is extremely cost efficient. First, it requires a very small amount of Uranium-235, the most commonly used fuel, to produce a great amount of energy. Any given amount of Uranium-235 will produce 3.7 million times the amount of energy as the same amount of coal. Although the Uranium itself is by ratio more expensive than coal, the sheer amount of coal used causes its net cost to be far greater than that of the Uranium. There is a similar relationship between nuclear and other non-renewable energy sources as well. Second, there is an abundant supply of Uranium-235. The United States, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Nigeria all contain from 270 to 2400 thousand tons each. France, Argentina, India, Algeria, Gabon, Brazil contain from 36 to 124 thousand tons each. Several other countries formerly part of the Soviet Union are also now in the market. And of course, part of the cost is returned to the economy by the mining industry, which makes the Uranium available. obviously, the use of nuclear power is remarkably economical. Compared to other non-renewable energy sourc... ... middle of paper ... ...y are sometimes made out to be. The use of nuclear power, despite drawbacks, is immensely beneficial. It is very cost efficient and environmentally friendly. Although there is a certain amount of negative, it is insignificant when compared to the positive. Yes, completely renewable resources are ideal power sources, but until the technology is perfected to the point that they can solely be depended on, nuclear power is by far the best choice. Bibliography "Environmental Impacts of Coal Power:air Pollution." Union of Concerned Scientists. Union of Concerned Scientists, n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2014. . "Reasons for Using Nuclear Power As an Energy Source." Reasons for Using Nuclear Power As an Energy Source. The Virtual Nuclear Tourist, n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2014. .
Nuclear power has grown to be a big percentage of the world’s energy. As of January 18, 2013 in 31 countries 437 nuclear power plant units with an installed electric net capacity of about 372 GW are in operation and 68 plants with an installed capacity of 65 GW are in 15 countries under construction. As of end 2011 the total electricity production since 1951 amounts to 69,760 billion kWh. The cumulative operating experience amounted to 15, 15,080 years by end of 2012. (European Nuclear Society) The change that nuclear power has brought to the world has led to benefits in today’s energy’s usage.
power is not the cleanest energy source. However nuclear energy is cheaper than fossil fuels, and the
In my opinion nuclear power is pretty amazing, and I doubt that people really believe otherwise. The amount of energy that it can produce compared to other sources of energy is huge. I believe that as long as it is done with the utmost care, nuclear power is the best source of energy we can
Carbon, Max W. Nuclear Power: Villain or Victim?: Our Most Misunderstood Source of Electricity. Second ed. Madison, WI: Pebble Beach, 1997.
There are many sources of energy today, and the best source of it is constantly being sought after, one source stands out above the rest. Nuclear energy is simple in theory, yet it may be one of the most controversial sources of power. Nuclear energy works using reactors built to split the atoms (nuclear fission) of the fuel to produce heat. This heat evaporates the cooling agent (usually water) into steam which turns turbines to create electricity. Nuclear energy should be allowed, because it produces an abundance of electricity, as well as being a clean source of energy with no harmful emissions. Nuclear energy is the future of clean, environmentally friendly energy.
After reading the report titled “Coal Blooded: Putting Profits before People.” I agree that some coal-fired power plants do represent a health issue for those around them. I take exception to the generalization that all coal-fired power plants are unhealthy. The Executive Director of the Indigenous Environment Network, Tom Goldtooth boldly stated: “Clean coal is an oxymoron.” However, one only needs to look at Appendix III of the report. It indicates the exclusion of plants fired by “Anthracite/Bituminous Coal,” “Lignite Coal,” “Subbituminous Coal,” “Waste/Other Coal,” and “Coal Synfuel,” This exclusion shows your bias of the coal industry in general and coal-fired plants specifically. There is also the implication that coal-fired plants are
Central Idea: Nuclear energy only contributes a small amount to the world’s electricity yet it has hazards and dangers that far out-way its benefits. There are many other alternative power producing sources that can produce energy more efficiently and more safely than nuclear power plants can.
After the United States developed the atomic at the end of World War II, interest in nuclear technology increased exponentially. People soon realized that nuclear technology could be used for electricity, as another alternative to fossil fuels. Today, nuclear power has its place in the world, but there is still a lot of controversy over the use of nuclear energy. Things such as the containment of radiation and few nuclear power plant accidents have given nuclear power a bad image. However, nuclear power is a reliable source of energy because it has no carbon emissions, energy is available at any time, little fuel is needed for a lot of energy, and as time goes on, it is becoming safer and safer.
...r power. Nuclear is a centralized power source. It cannot process on its own. It requires wind and solar energy to function. The waste produced by nuclear power plants takes over 200,000 years to disintegrate. Uranium is the main fuel used and is much more difficult to find and more of a pollutant than other gasses that can be used. The environmental pollution and health risks are catastrophic. New technologies to improve the nuclear systems will not be approved for decades. Nuclear energy is also very destructive to both the site of the power plants and a target for terrorism. The risks of nuclear power do not pay off for the lives that could be lost using this risks energy source.
8) "Interesting Energy Facts." : Nuclear Energy Has Great Potential. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 May 2014.
When the word “nuclear” is brought up in a conversation, the common idea that comes to mind is traditionally a huge, devastating explosion or possibly a plant such as the one at Fukushima exploding in a shower of radiation. Many undereducated people will say that nuclear power is not worth the risk and will point out nuclear disasters that have happened fairly recently, instantly closing any debate that might have been ensuing on the topic. However, though it may seem peculiar, these people are not helping the world by aiding in the anti-nuclear campaign, but instead are destroying the planet from the inside out.
The use of nuclear power in the mid-1980s was not a popular idea on account of all the fears that it had presented. The public seemed to have rejected it because of the fear of radiation. The Chernobyl accident in the Soviet Union in April of 1986 reinforced the fears, and gave them an international dimension (Cohen 1). Nevertheless, the public has to come to terms that one of the major requirements for sustaining human progress is an adequate source of energy. The current largest sources of energy are the combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas. Fear of radiation may push nuclear power under the carpet but another fear of the unknown is how costly is this going to be? If we as the public have to overcome the fear of radiation and costly project, we first have to understand the details of nuclear energy. The known is a lot less scary then the unknown. If we could put away all the presumptions we have about this new energy source, then maybe we can understand that this would be a good decision for use in the near future.
Environmental Health & Engineering, Inc. EMISSIONS OF HAZERDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FROM COAL- FIRED POWER PLANTS. Environmental Report. Needham, 2011. Print. 18 November 2014.
Nuclear power, the use of exothermic nuclear processes to produce an enormous amount of electricity and heat for domestic, medical, military and industrial purposes i.e. “By the end of 2012 2346.3 kilowatt hours (KWh) of electricity was generated by nuclear reactors around the world” (International atomic energy agency Vienna, 2013, p.13). However, with that been said it is evident that the process of generating electricity from a nuclear reactor has numerous health and environmental safety issues.
The energy produced from nuclear reactions is very dense, providing almost ten million times more energy per atom than fossil fuels.2 In addition, nuclear plants are cost competitive, being no more expensive than alternative sources. Although there are huge initial start up costs, the only other expenses are the costs to process nuclear fuel, safely remove and store radioactive waste and daily upkeep of the plant.2