Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A summary of the difference between the north and the south
Comparing the north and south in the 1800s
The differences between the north and the south
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Have you ever compared and contrasted the South and the North? If you have, then you would see a lot of differences and very few similarities. The North and the South are very different, they are different in culture, work, ideas, and climate. They have very few similarities but a lot more differences. First, The South depended on slavery, while slavery was considered unconstitutional in the North for its cruelty and harsh punishments. The North had better farmland than the South, but the South still had very good land. The South used its land for farming and growing cotton, while people in the North worked in factories that produced goods. Finally, The North and South had different tr The North and South had very different climate and soil,
The American Civil War between the North and the South was one of the most significant wars in American History, and the most destructive war ever fought on American soil. The war began in 1861 and ended in 1865. On July 1, 1863, the Confederate army and the Union army fought in the largest battle of the American Civil War, the Battle of Gettysburg. Throughout Michael's Shaara's novel, "The Killer Angels," the North and south had many differing attitudes toward the war, such as the overall cause, opposing amongst each individual throughout the book. The North and the South both demonstrate their motives for taking part in the war, while their attitudes towards each other and their beliefs of the events that will occur after the war differ greatly.
In “Antebellum Southern Exceptionalism: A New Look at an Old Question” James McPherson argues that the North and the South are two very different parts of the country in which have different ideologies, interests, and values. Mcpherson writes this to show the differences between the north and the south. He gives perspectives from other historians to show how the differently the differences were viewed. These differences included the north being more industrialized while the south was more agricultural. He gives evidence to how the differences between the north and south came together as the south produced tobacoo, rice, sugar and cotton, which was then sent to the north to be made into clothing or other fabrics. Mcpherson analyzes the differences
The New England and Southern colonies, although they had their differences, did share a similar government system. However, the differences on a economic, religious, and social level overrode the similarity shared, making the two regions different nonetheless. The New England’ colonies focus on a business economy made them a central area of trade and commerce, but in the long run created society open to innovation and brought in new inventions. Whereas the Southern colonies’ focus on agriculture economy brought a sensation of profits for the mother country, but later attributed to the introduction of slave codes. Then, in the New England colonies, the religious restrictions increased tensions between the Separatists and Puritans, which later
By the 1700’s, The northern and souther colonies had evolved into two distinct societies. This is so because the northern and southern colonies had different environments and also different reasons of settlement. The North was established for mainly religious freedom, while on the other hand, the south had been established for economic freedom. The climate also affected the different turnout of the north and the south. The north was much colder and so their soil was not beneficial for farming, so the people of the north found other jobs, while on the other side, the south had rich soil and the colonists there used that idea to set up huge plantations and farms.
oth had a high code of honour. The people in the South were more respectable and had higher status if they had a lot of slaves. The North also had a high code of honour and this depended on their education and careers. Both the North and the South were also very religious and practiced their religion. Overall, I feel that the differences were very substantial between the North and the South as these differences played a part to the Civil War.
Slavery prospered more in the South than in the North. Many have wondered why this occurred. This happened for several reasons. To begin with, the South needed additional workers to operate their farms and plantations. Another reason they had slaves was to increase the size of their military force. Last but not least, they didn’t feel that African Americans were entitled to human rights. Based on these items, the Northerners did not share the same view on slavery as the Southerners did. Most of the population in the North did not condone slavery. This was partially because they did not have the same agricultural needs. In addition to this, they felt that all races deserved to be treated equally.
It was not until the 1700s that the thirteen colonies finally started to flourish on their own. The east coast of North America was soon booming with success. But the Northern and Southern colonies’ did not take exactly the same routes in order to reach success. The Southern and Northern colonies began to show similarities in immigration and social structure and began to show differences in their economy.
Before the mid 1800s, the north and south dealt with a lot of disagreements that involved economic differences. The differences dealt with slavery, representation, states’ rights, and tariffs. There was a conflict with states wanting to balance the freedom of slaves in the states. Another cause was the tariffs which dealt with the taxation of imported goods, the Northern states supported protective tariffs, but the South did not. Consequently, the conflicts began to grow and this increased the differences between the North and South. During the early to mid 1800s sectional differences forced the north and south farther and farther apart. The differences that affected the North and South involved the missouri compromise of 1820, the cotton gin invention, and the Uncle Tom’s novel.
During the American Revolution and the civil war, the North and the South experienced development of different socio-political and cultural environmental conditions. The North became an industrial and manufacturing powerhouse as a result of rise of movements like abolitionism and women’s right while the South became a cotton kingdom whose labor was sourced from slavery (Spark notes, 2011).
both in the north and the south , the north as it was afraid if the
With the United States of America a free country, it would only be normal for ideology of different states to no agree on certain subjects. From state to state even today one can see how much different one is from one another and at the same time exponentially different. A simple view of the United States is that of the “North” and the “South”. Both of which have clear delineations from how they speak to their commerce. Not only is the landscape different it’s even the food they ingest is widely different. What does all this mean exactly and were might this commentary be going? It’s simple, the North and South just don’t understand each other, but seem to respect one another. This culminates from the Civil War and the travesty it caused
The Southern and Northern states varied on many issues, which eventually led them to the Civil War. There were deep economic, social, and political differences between the North and the South. These differences stemmed from the interpretation of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, all of these disagreements about the rights of states led to the Civil War. There were reasons other than slavery for the South?s secession. The manifestations of division in America were many: utopian communities, conflicts over public space, backlash against immigrants, urban riots, black protest, and Indian resistance (Norton 234). America was a divided land in need reform with the South in the most need. The South relied heavily on agriculture, as opposed to the North, which was highly populated and an industrialized society. The South grew cotton, which was its main cash crop and many Southerners knew that heavy reliance on slave labor would hurt the South eventually, but their warnings were not heeded. The South was based on a totalitarian system.
The North and South had lots of differences, one of the most important one is slavery, North outlawed slavery at 1777, by the time of the 1850s, slavery was almost completely gone in the North while the South still has lots of slaves. The South outlawed slavery at 1865, but before that slavery in
The economies of the North and South were vastly different leading up to the Civil War. Money was equivalent to power in both regions. For the North, the economy was based on industry as they were more modern and self-aware. They realized that industrialization was progress and it could help rid the country of slave labor as it was wrong. The North’s population had a class system but citizens could move within the system, provided they made the money that would allow them to move up in class. The class system was not as rigid as it was in the South. By comparison, the South wanted to hold on to its economic policy. In doing so, the practice of slavery kept the social order firmly in place. The economic factors, social issues and a growing animosity between the two regions helped to induce the Civil War.
Increasing affluence and political influence in the North exacerbated the impending economic and political plight of the South, tearing apart the nation. Observing a stronger sentiment towards the peculiar institution of slavery by the South, Abraham Lincoln asserted that the country is destined to crumble. In a speech at Springfield Illinois, Lincoln accentuates, “A House divided against itself cannot stand.” Southern aggravation toward the North can be seen as a result of the North’s higher capital, growing incomes, and leverage in government. Thomas P. Kettell’s examination of the regional distribution of wealth in 1850 depicts the significant difference in the value of bank capital between the North and South. The North accumulated almost