Compare And Contrast North And South

741 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Civil war north vs south

With the United States of America a free country, it would only be normal for ideology of different states to no agree on certain subjects. From state to state even today one can see how much different one is from one another and at the same time exponentially different. A simple view of the United States is that of the “North” and the “South”. Both of which have clear delineations from how they speak to their commerce. Not only is the landscape different it’s even the food they ingest is widely different. What does all this mean exactly and were might this commentary be going? It’s simple, the North and South just don’t understand each other, but seem to respect one another. This culminates from the Civil War and the travesty it caused …show more content…

(Preston, 1) This would mean that even while the constitution had the mention of slavery in it, not allowing it further would be in violation of states which used slavery. Their use of slavery would be in direct support of their commerce in the Union. Clearly the North had abolished slavery and moved beyond this from of “Free labor” to paying cheaper labor. This wasn’t so easy for the South to do as the ideology of financial survival was carried on the backs of their slaves. Having the North refuse to condone slavery appeared to have shown their hand in controlling the new lands …show more content…

Keeping the Union as a totalitarian force would only strengthen the bond of a nation in more ways than one. “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery”. (Lincoln, 1) Lincoln was bound to follow the Constitution and couldn’t play “favorites” to either side during a tumultuous period in America. “No State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union”. (Lincoln, 1) Its clear cut Lincoln’s view is the Union is to remain whole and by law should remain that way. “A husband and wife by be divorced and go out for the presence and beyond the reach of each other, but the different part of our country cannot do this.” (Lincoln, 2) Simply put the complete Union will succeed, a broken Union will crumble under its own

Show More
Related

  • Northern vs. Southern American Colonies 1700s

    423 Words  | 1 Pages

    By the 1700’s, The northern and souther colonies had evolved into two distinct societies. This is so because the northern and southern colonies had different environments and also different reasons of settlement. The North was established for mainly religious freedom, while on the other hand, the south had been established for economic freedom. The climate also affected the different turnout of the north and the south. The north was much colder and so their soil was not beneficial for farming, so the people of the north found other jobs, while on the other side, the south had rich soil and the colonists there used that idea to set up huge plantations and farms.

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1860’s the United States weren’t united because of the issue of slavery. The civil war was never just about getting the union back together, but about making it count and getting rid of slavery. The south wanted their slaves and would say they are “-the happiest, and in some, the freest people in the world”. (Doc 5) However, the north knew that was not true because of Harriet Beecher Stowe's “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. In 1854 when the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed it caused some issues. Anti-slavery supporters were not happy because they did not want expansion of slavery, but the pro-slavery supporters weren’t happy because they wanted slavery everywhere for sure. (Doc. 7)The Kansas-Nebraska act caused trouble before it was even passed, Senator Charles Sumner argued against and attacked pro-slavery men causing Preston Brooks to beat Sumner with a cane. The south praised Brooks while the north felt for Sumner. (Doc 8) In 1858 during his acceptance speech Lincoln said his famous line, “A house divided

    Read More

  • Election of Lincoln and Civil War

    1277 Words  | 3 Pages

    A rift between the north and the south had been present since the late eighteenth centaury. It began with the industrial revolution, which saw the northern states prosper. The north changed industries from fa...

    Read More

  • The Great Compromise

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Signers did not have much to say on the issue of slavery during this time. In fact, I don’t believe it is mentioned in the words of the Constitutions, rather clauses are in place that seem to touch on the issue of slavery. It may appear the Signers avoided the word altogether. As we know there were clauses included that held some important, rights for slaves and mainly what I can tell slave owners, on the issue of slavery. Although it would seem, at the time in history this was written, and normal way of life, to have offered some protection to slaves.

    Read More

  • Sectionalism In The United States:

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    Slavery was abolished in the North when Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. This proclamation upset the southern states and they decided to sever their ties with the rest of the country. In the textbook it says, "Northerners saw the South as a slave power, determined to foist the slave system on free labor throughout the land. Southerners saw the North as full of black republicanism, determined to destroy their way of life" ...

    Read More

  • Celia, A Slave...

    1459 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The American constitution recognized slavery as a local constitution within the legal rights of the individual states. But in the North slavery was not adaptable to the local economy, and to many, it contradicted the vision of the founding fathers for a nation in which all men are to be free. The South considered slavery as a necessary institution for the plantation economy. It was linked to the local culture and society. As the United states expanded, the North worried that the South would introduce slavery into the new territories. Slavery had become both a moral issue and a question of political power." (Kral p61)

    Read More

  • Civil War Sectionalism

    1604 Words  | 4 Pages

    North and South The United States of America, the great democratic experiment, was just that. Not since the great Greek culture had a government of, for, and by the people existed. The entire world felt, that on a large scale, democracy would inevitably lead to anarchy; our founding fathers were determined to prove them wrong. But as the political stand off with the British became a secession issue, a great issue split the future nation. Slavery, a southern necessity, both social and economic, threatened the unity of our nation. A nation that would one day be the greatest the world had ever known. During the development of the thirteen colonies, diversity set in early. In the south the temperate climate made the growth of tobacco a suitable and very profitable business. Cultivation of this crop required a lot of land, and therefore settlers lived far apart. Northern Colonies, though, were much more dependent on small farms, with closely knit communities. These differences were the seed of a sectional division that would plague the nation for a century. During the late seventeenth century, this fissure in the ideals of the colonies became apparent. Following the constant political irreverence from Britain, a majority of colonial representatives felt the need for independence. The Declaration of Independence was the document written to do this. It called for an abolition of slavery as well as freedom from British rule. Unfortunately, the South would hear nothing of it. Being strong defenders of states rights, most of the Southern states adhered to their believe in a government less like a supreme authority and more like a dominion of independent states. They would rather stay loyal to their oppressive government than participate in one that shunned their way of life. In order to keep their dreams of independence, they North was forced to make the one cession they did not wish to make. In order to keep a unified nation, the slavery issue was deliberately absent from the Declaration. Some of the Northern delegates were outraged, but none more than John Adams. A renowned proponent of equal rights, he was one of few that saw the irony in establishing a free society without freeing those in bondage. John Adams seems now more like Nostrodamus when he voiced his concern about the slavery issue for future generations. He did not know it, but the couldn’t have been more right.

    Read More

  • John Calhoun on Slavery

    903 Words  | 2 Pages

    The growth of the Northern abolition movement and attempts by Northern politicians to push the federal government to act against slavery confirmed for Calhoun that the North intended to exercise its power as a majority to the detriment of Southern interests. He responded to these attacks with the argument that the Constitution gave Congress no regulatory power over slavery. Even compromise was not possible, in his opinion.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The New England Middle And Southern Colonies

    895 Words  | 2 Pages

    Q 1. The American colonies were divided into three distinct regions and these regions were different from each other in their origins, populations, economics and agriculture, religious makeup, and connection to England .write an essay comparing and contrasting the New England, middle, and southern colonies with specific examples.

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between The Northern And Southern Colonies

    132 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Northern and Southern Colonies had many differences and similarities. Politically and socially, in the Northern Colonies, the church controlled the law and was noticed throughout the colony. However, in the South, land owners were the wealthiest and controlled the laws. They were the dominant party instead of the church like in the Northern Colonies. The North was filled with small farms and larger cities whereas the South had larger plantations but fewer large cities. Another difference was that the South relied very heavily on slave labor. Although there were slaves in the North, there were not nearly as many compared to the Southern Colonies. In comparison, the Northern and Southern Colonies were closely related, economically. They

    Read More

  • The Secession of the South

    778 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ld not protect the interest of the Southern states. Coupled with the hostilities, lack of votes for Lincoln from the South and disregard for the constitutional protection of slavery is a justifiable reason from the Southern leaders to secede from the Union.

    Read More

  • Sectional Crisis In 1860

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    The writer of the article wants the US Congress to stay out of territorial affairs and use “popular sovereignty” to decide territorial laws. The author argues that the only reason slavery is still illegal in the North is because of the many foreign immigrants providing cheaper labor than the slaves. “It was a matter of dollars and cents, and not conscience: and thus it never will be,” he

    Read More

  • How Did Slavery Cause The Civil War

    1545 Words  | 4 Pages

    Abolitionist fought to make slavery illegal in those territories, just like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787.However Missouri was preparing to enter the union as a slave state, and Maine as a free state. Henry Clay had come up this this compromise to balance the states out, and so that it was fair for all the states and so there wouldn’t be an imbalance. Although advocates of slavery feared that if they let those states become non-slaveholding states that the ones that were slave-holding states would loose their power and become those non-slaveholding states, that they didn’t want. Which turned in to the “crisis of fear”. They felt that their safety was being threatened, what made it worse was John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry in Virginia in 1859, He had seized the federal arsenal and armory in Harpers Ferry, with his group that followed him, in which five of them were black. In doing so they hoped that more people would follow them in their revolt. Sadly Brown raiders were killed or captured and put on trial in the state of Virginia, so many supports had fear of joining, for the fear of being killed or captured. However no other slaves joined him, and the south still feared that it would remove slavery not only from those states, but also from the whole United States. The election of 1860 didn’t help either, as the republican candidate Lincoln had won. Part of

    Read More

  • The Secession Crisis

    903 Words  | 2 Pages

    Contrary to what today’s society believes about Lincoln, he was not a popular man with the South at this time. The South wanted to expand towards the West, but Lincoln created a geographical containment rule keeping slavery in the states it currently resided in. Despite his trying to rationalize with the South, Lincoln actually believed something different ”Lincoln claimed that he, like the Founding Fathers, saw slavery in the Old South as a regrettable reality whose expansion could and should be arrested, thereby putting it on the long and gradual road ”ultimate extinction” (216). He believed it to be “evil” thus “implying that free southerners were evil for defending it”(275). Lincoln wanted to wipe out slavery for good, and the South could sense his secret motives.

    Read More

  • The Emancipation Proclamation

    1746 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although, they didn’t favor emancipation, they were expecting slavery to die on its own over time. The border states that still held slavery, had many problems arise. A Union officer in Kentucky freed slaves, after a major victory. Many Union soldiers were upset and threw down their guns and disbanded. Lincoln had to intervene and unfree those slaves, because of fear of military backlash. The emancipation was very beneficial to the North, as it crippled the South’s production. They had very few slaves fighting for them, as they were now free. Still, the Emancipation Proclamation did great things for the North. Slaves that were held in rebellion states were now free people, which gave the Union more fighting support. As the freed slaves would join their cause to terminate slavery. With the Union’s victory of the war, it held to a stronger

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast North And South

Open Document