National Identification Essay

734 Words2 Pages

On September 11, 2001, the United States was attacked by terrorists. On that very fateful day, the twin towers in New York City were destroyed, the south wing of the pentagon was engulfed by flames, and a plane crash filled with innocent passengers found in Stonycreek Township, Pennsylvania. These events killed a total of 2,977 innocent men and woman. Following this event, the United States government were thinking of an easier way of identification for citizens, to reduce the threat of terrorism. When it comes to the citizens of the United States, the National Identification Cards should not be invested in, for it is a threat to the citizen’s livelihood and privacy. Although there are many people such as Alan M. Dershowitz who believes that having national identification cards could help make the United States safer. However, there a people such as William Safire who believe the national identification cards are a threat to a citizen’s security, immigrants, and terrorism. Alan M. Desrshowitz in an article he wrote called, “Why Fear National ID” explains his views on why the …show more content…

Most people are willing to give up their privacy in return for a greater safety. Police have already developed heat sensors to let them look inside people's houses. Safire means that the national ID cards give "false sense of security" because initially it will be meant to protect the individual and later on it will become more of a commercial thing. Yes, I do agree with Safire, national ideas are a false promise for protection. Like he mentions, later on there will be many people arguing that such information should be provided in the national ID. The advantage of having a national ID card is that it would be easy to keep up with your information, more convenient. Some disadvantages are that it could hold to much information that if stolen or used in the wrong way can definitely affect the

Open Document