Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Influence of American Multiculturalism
The Influence of American Multiculturalism
The Influence of American Multiculturalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Influence of American Multiculturalism
1.Neoliberalism often times results in performative solidarity for the sake of multiculturalism, which merely is “being complicit with a dominant neo-liberal structure whose racial politics will always threaten the lives of people of color” (12). Neoliberalism, as defined by Cohen is “a prioritizing of markets and a corresponding commitment to the dismantling or devolution of social welfare, from the national government to the states, to the local government” because of the meritocracy myth that everyone has equal and fair access to the free market. Neoliberalism is framed by the contexts as “greater market expansion” and freedom with a corresponding dissolution of what was formerly known as the “safety net.” It is seen as a utopia of neutrality …show more content…
Neoliberalism only results in increased policing, criminalization, and incarceration of these communities, which then results in redlining, gentrification, and white flight, with the skyrocketing prices within the real estate market, leaving those unable to afford this lifestyle, therefore reliant on the welfare state for survival. Recently neoliberalism has been decorated with the rhetoric of multiculturalism, not coincidentally by a black president, who is often mistakenly used as a token of racial inclusion and possible success, regardless of one’s race or class, as neoliberals continue to argue is the idea of meritocracy and “pulling one up by their bootstraps” to attain success, disregarding of their position within an oppressive economy. This new phenomenon was amplified by President Obama, to address some of the racial tensions in the country by adopting a colorblind ideology that disregards and dismisses the effects and influence of identity and privilege and faults those of color for their lack of success and assimilation into white culture that typically tends to …show more content…
Not only does neoliberalism pathologize black bodies, but it is a double edged sword when paired with the equally dangerous, multiculturalism. This only fuels “white resentment politics” fueled by white fear that further works to demonize and separate those whom white society believe as so far from normal, hypersexual, and ultimately invasive (14). This leads to hyper policing of these people and their neighborhoods, which does not prevent nor cease violence of oppression in this area, but only perpetuates it, as “prisons and policing” replace “investment and employment,” and therefore, these marginalized groups are bracketed off from participating in what neoliberalism claims to be “fair” system (15). Neoliberalism is similar to “all lives matter rhetoric, that is responsible for “undermining any state-sponsored programs that would address the special needs of poor black people so their lives could actually matter
The Author transitions the past and present signatures of Jim Crow and the New Jim Crow with the suggestion that the New Jim Crow, by mass incarceration and racism as a whole, marginalizes and relegates Blacks to residential, educational and constitutionally endowed service to the Country. The final chapter of The New Jim Crow reviews the manner in which the Black community might respond to the racism that exists today. Some research implies that we in America have reached a point of attrition as to incarceration, and the positive effects outweigh the negative effects of marginalization and collateral damage to the community. By some research, the "War on Drugs" procreates poverty, joblessness, family breakdown, and crime.
Black Power, the seemingly omnipresent term that is ever-so-often referenced when one deals with the topic of Black equality in the U.S. While progress, or at least the illusion of progress, has occurred over the past century, many of the issues that continue to plague the Black (as well as other minority) communities have yet to be truly addressed. The dark cloud of rampant individual racism may have passed from a general perspective, but many sociologists, including Stokely Carmichael; the author of “Black Power: the Politics of Liberation in America”, have and continue to argue that the oppressive hand of “institutional racism” still holds down the Black community from making any true progress.
This essay will discuss Mexico’s transition to neoliberalism. This economic change includes the economic climate that lead up to the shift to neoliberalism, a background of neoliberal policy, and the economic and social impacts that it had. By exploring the origins of neoliberalism in Mexico and the reasoning for its implementation, a more thorough view of political and socio-economic patterns can be had. Furthermore, the discussion of neoliberalism provides insight to the inequality and large income gaps existent among the population as well as the immense effects had on such industries as agriculture and the political implications displayed by said effects.
...lcolm X. He also speaks o black poverty, which he states, " is primarily due to the disruption of wealth power and income." He reiterates that capitalism is the root of the American racial dilemma, and that little real change can be achieved without the reorganization of the economy. West's comments about the "new black conservatives" is just one of the groups in black politics that is criticized in this book.
According to Dei & Caliste (2000), this form of modern racism is based, among others, on conditions that are socially created which maintain and reinforce such environment. A critical understanding of the structural patterns, the identity of the dominant group, and their social location necessitates that these practices be identified. Second, being aware of the invisibility of whiteness can dismantle the system of oppression (Yee, 2005, p. 90). Recognition is not enough since social service workers collude with the status quo. Despite recognizing its existence, they have failed to see themselves as implicated in the same structure that oppresses them. Third, when systematic oppression and the clandestine identity of the whites have been concretized, discussion can be directed from a common generalization of the whites to a more contemporary understanding of the patterns of racism (ibid, p. 91). There must be a conscious exposure of the dominant group’s action as inviolable and natural; any analysis must reveal what identity and culture operate to further commit this systemic form of oppression and racism in the practice. Lastly and importantly, an effective and meaningful solution to the problem necessitates an understanding of whiteness and oppression (ibid, p. 95). Else, it will be more of conflict of rhetoric rather than, as what Dei & Caliste (2000) implied, an analysis of racial relations within broader sociological
In 2014, Dr. Wallace Best wrote a candid article for the Huffington Post discussing what he deemed as the irrational fear of black bodies. The context surrounding this critique stemmed from the surge of black men dying by white police officers. In the article, Dr. Best provided historical insight into this deeply rooted, unwarranted anxiety that white Americans have used as probable cause to commit violent acts against blacks, as well as systemic control over black men as a means of protection to maintain societal order. With this assertion, Dr. Best offered a critical analysis in understanding the fanatical need to preserve ownership over black movement due to this ubiquitous threat of black skin and the African American male. However, what
The late 1970’s-1980 may be looked upon as a turning point in the social and economic history of the world. David Harvey’s A Brief History of Neoliberalism looks at the roots of neoliberalism as a form of political economy. It is through these roots that Harvey attempts to clarify what the goal of neoliberalism actually is. The goal of Harvey throughout his book is to analyze a central contradiction of neoliberalism, between the utopian project and the political project. Harvey uses his book as a tool to articulate the history of neoliberalism throughout the world.
“Black Awakening in Capitalist America”, Robert Allen’s critical analysis of the structure of the U.S.’s capitalist system, and his views of the manner in which it exploits and feeds on the cultures, societies, and economies of less influential peoples to satiate its ever growing series of needs and base desires. From a rhetorical analysis perspective, Allen describes and supports the evidence he sees for the theory of neocolonialism, and what he sees as the black people’s place within an imperial society where the power of white influence reigns supreme. Placing the gains and losses of the black people under his magnifying glass, Allen describes how he sees the ongoing condition of black people as an inevitable occurrence in the spinning cogs of the capitalist machine.
Is Systematic Oppression still relevant? An examination into the roots of the Black Lives Matter Campaign and its Validity in Modern Times? Native Son: Essay Rough Copy
The structure of a society is based on the concept of superiority and power which both “allocates resources and creates boundaries” between factors such as class, race, and gender (Mendes, Lecture, 09/28/11). This social structure can be seen in Andrea Smith’s framework of the “Three Pillars of White Supremacy.” The first pillar of white supremacy is the logic of slavery and capitalism. In a capitalist system of slavery, “one’s own person becomes a commodity that one must sell in the labor market while the profits of one’s work are taken by someone else” (Smith 67). From this idea of viewing slavery as a means of capitalism, Blacks were subjected to the bottom of a racial hierarchy and were treated nothing more than a property and commodity that is used for someone else’s benefit. The second pillar involves the logic of genocide and colonialism. With genocide, “Non-Native peoples th...
In a society where a racial divide is growing more and more prominent everyday, black lives are being put into the spotlight. White people have always had the upper hand in America, but exactly how much of an upper hand do they have? It has always been apparent, since the first developed human society, that with power comes opportunity. With the lack of power and opportunity in their own right, people of color miss out on options for betterment and equality. In a society where there are very few people of color in the top one percent of the economy, obviously the opportunities are going to be limited for the remaining ninety-nine percent. Lacking in opportunities, the remaining ninety-nine
Literary: The literary approach to analyzing literature requires that the analyst focus on specific items including, the plot, illustrations, setting, and complexity. The emphasis is the story’s impact within itself, without considering the context that it was written or the reader’s schema. The story will maintain a “fixed meaning” over time (Bothelo & Rudman, 2009). When using the literary approach, the author’s language and intent is questioned to gain more information about the character’s interests and motives.
According to Omi and Winat, Color-blindness is an ideology that argues in favor of a white America, one that boasts the same ideals that the country was founded on (Omi & Winat, 2014). The ideology avoids a public perception of being racist by consistently undermining policies that negatively effect minorities in the country (Omi & Winat, 2014). It is a neoliberal ideology, meaning that it supports the idea of a private, capitalistic market where the blaming the victim policies reign (Omi & Winat, 2014). Neoliberals support the idea of “reverse racism”, which argues against the creating and continuation of policies meant to aid minorities, namely blacks, such as Affirmative Action (Omi & Winat, 2014). Neoliberals demonize these policies, which are meant to close the gap created between whites and people of other races due to previous policies such as segregation and slavery, for that exact reason (Omi & Winat, 2014). Neoliberals combat movements by minorities by using surveillance tactics and arresting key leaders. An example of a surveillance agency used in this vein is COINTELPRO (Omi & Winat, 2014). Neoliberals also use “code words” such as “illegal aliens” to devalue minorities without appearing racist (Omi & Winat, 2014). The term, “illegal aliens”, which is used to describe undocumented immigrants, dehumanized individuals and disregards their rights as people living in the United States. Other “code words” include “handouts” and “welfare queen” (Omi & Winat, 2014). Lastly, Neoliberals support the creation of race neutral policies, or policies that do not benefit one race over another. In today’s society, blacks and other minorities are severely disadvantaged and underrepresented, and by eliminating policies to support said people, they lose their ability to close the value gap between themselves and white people, as well as their voice to argue in favor of change in the public
Hence, “American tribalism is alive and well” (227), and this “tribalism” serves as an enablement of discrimination. Worse, despite racism reach many facets of American culture, from law enforcement (Ifemelu says that, when a crime is reported, people of color should “stay well away from the crime area for weeks, or [they] might be stopped for fitting the profile” (274)) to public opinion (Ifemelu advises black men to “be hyper-mellow…or someone will worry that [they]’re about to pull a gun” (274)) to the whitewashing of commercial products (Ifemelu says one knows one is being hurt by “White Privilege” if one “[uses] the ‘nude’ color of underwear and Band-Aids…already know[ing] that it will not match [their] skin” (430). These “nude” products are emblematic of the American idealization of “whiteness,” and the ways in which minorities suffer therefrom. Even worse, there is societal pressure for black people “not…to be angry about racism” (275), further demonstrating the flaws of American
Ask any American how they feel about multiculturalism you are likely to get one of two responses: either a cringe or a smile. Those that cringe will say something along the line of “Multiculturalism is the wrong way to look at things. It separates us by saying that everyone is different instead of saying that we are the same and unifying us.” Those that smile will talk about how great multiculturalism is because they get to see aspects of all different cultures on television and on the radio and they are free to explore all the different things that various cultures have to offer. In actuality, one cannot help but wonder if either of these responses reflects the true meaning of multiculturalism? What do these responses and others like them say about America’s attitude towards multiculturalism?