Michael Crowley's 'Muhammad Ali Was A Rebel'

1134 Words3 Pages

In Michael Crowley’s article “Muhammad Ali was a rebel, Michael Jordan is a brand name” he questions whether the people who view Michael Jordan as a hero, are in reason to that opinion or if they are merely supporting capitalism. The essay compares both Ali and Jordan to the influence they have had, specifically in political involvement. Muhammad was in his time, involved in taking political stands against the government such as his declination to be drafted. Michael on the other hand, avoided any relation to making comments when prompted. Both of these athletes became world renown because of the access people had to them. While with Ali it might have been less exploited because of less access then, Michael became a superstar because of the …show more content…

Therefore, an athlete’s “hero” status begins in this case, on the basketball court. They are heroes to their team and of the whole games, especially those who were betting on it. Crowley says in his article that Michael was a great player and “Because Jordan was nearly perfect on the court, there seemed to be a desire to find perfection in his character as well.” which, like with any other superstar athlete, they wanted to create this image for him. This has been the case with many athletes and is what is expected of them because corporations want sales and the way to accomplish that is to give consumers what they want, to believe that they are heroes in character as well. In an article called “Why do we make athletes role models?”, the author states that when asking a former NBA superstar, Charles Barkley, whether players should be seen as role models, his answer was no . Barkley doesn't believe children should be looking up to them and that is the responsibility of parents to be role models. The author on the other hand, bases his own opinion on what he has seen in the industry and states “ It is inescapable. Athletes will be figures of admiration and emulation in this sports obsessed society.” With that being said, athletes then and today are continued to be put on a pedestal and are expected to …show more content…

It is true that the world today has become focused on capitalism and making money has become one of the top priorities for most people. It is the American Dream reborn with new technology. Though, the fact that Michael has his own shoe brand and is the owner of the NBA team The Hornets, does not make him evil and uncaring like some make him out to be. In an article called “Jordan contributes to black issues”, they claim that while he may seem full of self-interest running his own business, he is providing much more. He is providing a good amount of minorities and blacks a job through his company. “Most blacks aren't used to that. We want our leaders and heroes to make noise. Instead, Jordan has had more black people employed and upwardly moving through a $2.5 billion shoe brand for years.” explains what people expect from athletes like him and what he is trying to do. Not only is he providing jobs, but he is showing an example to the youth, both athletes and non athletes, that they too can be financially successful and that changes can be done not only through boycotts but by having a different type of power. The article states that there has only been few players who make it into the the business side of sports and few blacks included, have had the small chance to do so. Therefore, Jordan is showing his influence through a modern

Open Document