Methods Of Linearity And Concentration

1273 Words3 Pages

It is the ability of the analytical method to relate the obtained results over a specific given range through mathematical equations or proportional to the concentration of the analyte in the sample in that specific range. Accordingly, Linearity is an important tool to assure that the response of the Area Under Concentration will be later translated into the correct percentage of that analyte in the sample
The linearity can be achieved by transforming from for example log, square root or reciprocal values of the AUC in order to be correlated to the correct assay percentage. The principle is to have a model (in other words equation) that can be applied over the desired range
The recommended Linearity Range to be covered is 80% – 120%, in practice however, the covered range is usually 50% - 150%, this is needed to include the worst case scenario and other evaluation of the behaviour of tablets and capsules during the in process controls for example (e.g., dissolution testing, where at certain point of the dissolution the full release is not achieved yet and only say 60% is in the media, therefore to create reliable dissolution profile the assay methods that covers the lower ranges are favoured)
The evaluation of the linearity is done using calibration curve and calculating its regression line and R2, both parameters should be submitted as a conclusion of the Linearity and Range testing

5. Detection Limit:
Identified as the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be detected by the method but not necessarily quantified as an exact value.
The limit of detection (LOD) is the degree at which the measured result is bigger than the uncertainty associated with it (in the HPLC system the peak can be distinguished from the backgroun...

... middle of paper ...

...e, the British Pharmacopeia Finished Drug Product method of analysis in the monograph was taken as granted without being checked for its appropriateness, in this situation Verification should have been carried to check at least the Accuracy, Precision and Specificity of the BP method for the finished product.
According to the findings of the performed full method validation, the specificity old method (BP one) was not specific, which means an overlap of the API peak with another component in the sample (could be excipient or degradation product) resulted in over estimation of the API content and therefore always obtaining high assay results.
The 5 rejected batches could have been saved as specificity is one of the required APC to be verified if verification was performed, in the early beginning before approving the BP method and applying it for the routine testing.

Open Document