Meno's Paradox Of Knowledge

589 Words2 Pages

In philosophy, anamnesis is derived from greek symbols it is a concept in Plato's epistemological and psychological theory that he develops in his dialogues Meno and Phaedo, and alludes to in his Phaedrus. It is the idea that humans possess knowledge from past incarnations and that learning consists of rediscovering that knowledge within us.
Meno : Socrates is challenged by Meno with what has become known as the sophistic paradox, or the paradox of knowledge: it was a battle of the minds and beliefs Meno asks them a question , And how are you going to search for [the nature of virtue] when you don't know at all what it is, In other words, if you don't know any of the attributes, properties, and/or other descriptive markers of any kind that help signify what something is (physical or otherwise), you won't recognize it, even if you come across it. And, as consequence, if the converse is true, and you do know the attributes, properties and/or other descriptive markers of this thing, then you shouldn't need to seek it out at all. The result of this line of thinking is that, in either instance, there is no point trying to gain that "something"; in the case of Plato's work, there is no point in seeking knowledge. …show more content…

knowledge that the soul has accumulated lives on for eternity, but each time the soul is incarnated its knowledge is forgotten in the trauma of birth. What one perceives to be learning, then, is the recovery of what one has forgotten. (Once it has been brought back it is true belief, to be turned into genuine knowledge by understanding.) And thus Socrates (and Plato) sees himself, not as a teacher, but as a midwife, aiding with the birth of knowledge that was already there in the

Open Document