Medea Norton Vs Creon

385 Words1 Page

On the contrary, the Norton version of Medea paints one of the strongest women in Greek society. When reading the Norton version, there is an insatiable thirst to read what Medea will say next since she has a technique of persuasion that is unrivaled by any woman in the play. All the more so supporting this is the legendary Creon himself admits to Medea, “Your words are soothing, but I’m terrified of what’s in your mind.” (Norton, 753). When the notorious ruler Creon can agree that the words are soothing, but terrifying, one must know that the language is far more cunning than simple animalistic urges. The pinnacle of the differences is the language surrounding the slaughter of Medea’s children. Medea utters confusing phrases, “…I must kill …show more content…

She desires to kill her spawn out of love instead of her spawn dying at the furious hands of Creon’s men. “Arm yourself my heart. Why am I waiting to do this terrible, necessary crime? Unhappy hand, act now.” (Norton, 776). This quote performs to show the reader the internal struggle that is absorbing Medea’s beyond distressed mind. Norton’s version makes it clear that Medea is not acting on animalistic urges, but is fighting amongst her own thoughts on whether or not to kill her children. “…do not weaken, don’t remember that you love your children dearly, that you gave them life. For one short day forget your children.” (Norton, 776). Again, this furthers the point that Medea cares about these children more than an animal just slaughtering out of urges. An animalistic urge would act almost immediately. After many discussions within her head, Medea decides that the best route for her children, and her mind, is to end their suffering. Ending the children’s suffering also deepens the suffering of Jason, making it impossible for Jason to ever heal. It was quite obviously a lot more thought went into this decision ending her children, unlike any animalistic, primal

Open Document