More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of teachers'student relationship
Effect of teachers'student relationship
Effect of teachers'student relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of teachers'student relationship
I believe that the thesis for this paper is: “They [students] will also discover that they have been cheated by our educational system” (Sherry).
The Shocking statement is meant to grab the reader's attention and, wonder what she meant by “meaningless diplomas.” We then discover that the meaning behind the absurd comment was directed to the attitude of the teachers, shoving students through high school no matter what their grades are.
Sherry suspects that teachers blame the environment that they live in for their failing grades. She believes that its wrong because, “Passing students who have not mastered the work cheated them and the employers who expect them to have basic skills” (Sherry).
She concluded that students need to know who is in charge in the classroom, and the only way of doing that is to show them that if they don't what to pay attention then they fail, no other options (Sherry).
…show more content…
Sherry’s title was probably used to trick readers into believing that the essay was about a certain word, and how it can be positively used in all types of communication.
She hoped to preserve the saying so that the reader cannot assume that her student did not mean anything else and Sherry didn't rephrase it.
Her son’s senior English teacher threatened to fail him if he didn't pay attention in class sherry thought that it was a radical approach at the time but, her son finished the semester with an A (Sherry), proving that the technique
Matthew L. Sanders discusses the necessity of taking responsibility for one’s own education in a section of his book Becoming a Learner: Realizing the Opportunity of Education. In this section, Sanders explains how he initially blamed an instructor for not teaching him sufficiently and then learned that “No matter what kind of teacher you have, no matter what kind of class you are taking, if you are a learner you will set out to understand the material and create opportunities for success.” This statement is true and the concept can be applied through many methods to create success for students if they are willing to put forth effort.
Those students with meaningless diplomas are the ones who have been cruising along even though they do not truly understand the materials that were taught to them. Those students that plainly do not understand the material taught to them make excuses. Teachers see these student’s excuses as a lack of attention and fail those students but instead all those students needed were a bit of guidance. It takes a teacher's involvement to understand, not a teacher's threat. Sherry argues that our educational system is to blame for cheating those students out of a proper education.
Within the walls of our educational system lie many adverse problems. Is there a solution to such problems? If so, what is the solution? As we take a look at two different essays by two different authors’ John Gatto and Alfie Kohn, both highlight what’s wrong within our educational system in today’s society. As John Gatto explores the concept if schools are really as necessary as they’re made out to be; Alfie Kohn analyzes the non-importance of letter grades within our schools. Although both essays are fairly different, they still pose some similarities in relation to the educational system in today’s society.
In the marketplace, products of poor quality are able to sell based off of a shiny finish rather than a superior function, which is relatable to the education world where schools issue empty degrees. From community colleges to Ivy League schools, within a very short time period average scores have become excellent scores. Full-time teachers have several motives for handing out high grades: avoid unpopular class cancellation, submission to administrative pressure, and to earn promotions. Similarly, part-time teachers with less job security than their full time counterparts have cause to give in to pressure as well, succumbing to threats made by complaining students. There
In other words, two teachers may give the same assignment two completely different grades based on their own grading style. This puts an incredible amount of stress on a student because they need to complete assignments that will satisfy their current teacher, whose expectations and grading style could be very similar or very different from the student’s previous teacher. Alfie Kohn believes that the influence grades have on a student’s life doesn’t help this situation, and may even make it worse by providing students with a false sense of security about their knowledge. In her article “From Degrading to De-grading”, she states that scores on tests can be largely based on how the test was written and what skills were tested (Kohn 240). Therefore, it is up to teachers to identify what topics students must master in order to be proficient and score well on standardized tests. But when the class is not structured with a consideration for the material used on such tests, students enter the test blind to the skills that they will be expected to know and use. Anyone can memorize a list of facts off a study guide and score well on a multiple choice test the next day, but skills such as analyzing literature and interpreting a handful of graphs containing data from a scientific experiment are skills that require time and hours of instruction to master.
Our education system is failing and in his essay “What Our Education System Needs Is More F’s” Carl Singleton writes that nothing else will right the ship or fix this issue except for his proposed solution which is to simply fail more students. As a matter of fact “by the dozens, hundreds, thousands, even millions” (Singleton 1) is how he describes the failing grades should be distributed. He claims that illegitimately passing students has existed for the past two decades and even implies that it stems further back than that with many teachers in the school system today “who never should have been certified in the first place.”(Singleton 1).
She claims that “schools are complex ecosystems,” meaning that there are multiple factors in question. One factor is the challenge of hiring good teachers, “given the privations of the job and poor odds of student success.” Some teachers choose to leave schools in low-income areas due to the amount of money they receive, as schools in high-income areas earn more; creating an imbalance between good or bad teachers and high or low-income areas. Another factor are the unsafe conditions in schools, as “it is hard to teach and even harder to learn in such places”. Problems like “stiflingly hot classrooms, collapsing ceilings, poisoned drinking water” all intervene with the ability for children to learn. By focusing on these issues, schools can repair and mend the in-school stressors that affect children in low-income
The education system has heavily relied on students socioeconomic factors to dictate their education style ultimately preparing them for skills necessary to fit in their social class. The American dream is dead, it is no longer to strive and work hard to become successful, rather as Bambara shows it, work hard to barely survive day to day. Bambara portrays this division by the inference that the characters have little to no knowledge or respect for a higher education or for a matter of factor a education at all. Silvia, the main character, features all three minority factors, low income and an African American female. Moreover, the expectancy of success is nevertheless little to nothing greater than her parents. Due to her socioeconomic background, higher education is viewed as a joke, referred to a “goddamn college degree” (254). Silvia is then subjected to live a lifestyle common to her parents, to not strive to be able to buy a toy boat for a thousand dollars, but to frown upon the possibility.
An anonymous professor. self-dubbed “Professor X“ laments in his article the “Iv, Tower about the flaws of the educational system that he/she must deal with personally. Being an English professor teaching an intro to English n ight-c la.. Profe.or X often must deal with the under, gilled students that attempt to get a degree, despite their lack of proficiency. Professor X 's mtic le is mainly an anecdote that emphasizes the position he is in as -the man who has to lower the hammer, and hold these under-qualified students to college standar.. and often give them the failing grade. Marty Nemko however, author of "America ' s Most Overrated Product: The Bachelor 's Degree", .scusses in his aMcle the overemphasized importance of the bachelor 's degree, and offers grueling statistics and arguments that sup, in favor of some people abstaining from higher education and pursuing other. just as respectable career paths. Zachary Karabell. in his essay *The $10,000 Hoop-, questiorts the wisdom of the automatic r., most Americans give to someone who holds a degree. Karabell insinuat. that a higher education Ls almost overrated. and that street-smarts can never be replaced by a plaque on the wall with a dean 's signature on
Furthermore, she insists that (educators) ignore the fact that children learning abilities are different as a reply to their saying “ every child can learn” (P.99). She goes on to maintain that test scores cannot be used to prove if students learn anything. According to Ravitch, social scientists report that families’ incomes affect students’ educational lives more than their teachers do. In her book, she supports her claim by mentioning that economists observe that 60% of the test score variation is responsible for family. On the other hand, 20-25% is accounted for school while 15% of test score variation is teachers’ responsibility. Moreover, Ravitch emphasizes the importance of evaluating teachers based on their way of instruction, not their students’ performance in tests. She finally concludes by wondering what reformers exactly mean by “great” teachers. She presents two types of teachers who can be described as “great”. The first one is teachers who motivate and inspire their students to learn and those can only be identified by students and supervisors. They cannot be recognized by test scores. The second type is teachers who are great, in the performers’ terms, for raising students’ test scores, but they are not relevant based on Ravitch’s information. According to her, no school has teachers in which everyone of them raises his or her
Recent high school graduates are not well prepared to face society as it really is cruel, confusing, and tough. In school students are not taught skills they will need out of the classroom, what they are taught is memorization, and multiple choice test taking in which they can guess their way through or just simply cheat. In the article “For Once, Blame the Students” by the author Patrick Welsh he states that “Failure in the classroom is often tied to lack of funding, poor teachers or other skills. Here 's a thought: Maybe it 's the failed work ethic of today’s kids” (Welsh). When teachers teach a new lesson they make students take notes on their textbook and then, they give them multiple choice tests to see if they learned anything. Learning
In many low income communities, there are teachers that are careless and provide their students with poor quality education. These teachers are there just to make sure that they keep receiving their monthly paychecks and act in this way because they believe that low income students do not have the drive, the passion, or the potential to be able to make something of themselves and one day be in a better place than they are now. Anyon reveals that in working class schools student’s “Work is often evaluated not according to whether it is right or wrong but according to whether the children followed the right steps.” (3). This is important because it demonstrates that low income students are being taught in a very basic way. These children are being negatively affected by this because if they are always being taught in this way then they will never be challenged academically, which can play a huge role in their futures. This argument can also be seen in other articles. In the New York Times
Why is it the fault of the educator that their students cheat? Blaming teachers for plagiarism is outrageous. While there is more that teachers can and should do, blaming them isn’t the answer. There is even a real story of a college professor who caught 20% of his class cheating and was rewarded by the smallest...
Although many factors influence students achievements both non measurable and measurable, the role that teachers play in student achievement matters most compared to any other aspect of schooling. Teachers view of students has manifest over the years throughout society, and has impacted students schoolwork, and their classroom setting. They are given the opportunity to challenge their students in their work, and push them to succeed. If teachers view their students only as a place to deposit information rather than to exercise and mold, students will lack the work necessary to excel in the classroom.
One quality that Mrs. Jones has that demonstrates a poor educational system, is her way of belittling the students. She never said comments like, "try harder next time," or anything encouraging. She just looks down upon students who do poorly. This is similar to the comment made in the story by Zawodniak where the teacher, Jeff, says, "I’ll have to help some of you more than I want to"(125). Both of these types of attitudes make students intimidated and afraid to ask anymore questions. Teachers should say comments more along the lines of, "if there are any questions…." Or anything encouraging. They should be open and willing to do anything for the students, but this is definitely not the attitude taken on by Mrs. Jones, or Jeff. Mrs. Jones loves giving back tests with bad grades. When the time came for Mrs. Jones to hand back a te...